Not at all. It's been reported by the mainstream media in the part of the world where it's relevant, and I should say that's enough.
What strikes me as odd - and not a little disturbing - is when someone from the other side of the world with, presumably, no connection with the criminal or the people affected by the crime, comes across an article of particular sexual depravity (no pun intended), and decides to share it with his circle of social media acquaintances. It is often the same people who share the same type of content time after time, which suggests a certain unhealthy fascination with a particular type of crime.
Out of all the people who read the report as a result of it being shared beyond what was necessary or appropriate, a few will share it again, and so on. And a few will have their interest sufficiently piqued (I hesitate to use the word "aroused") that they dig a bit deeper into the case in an attempt to get a glimpse of the type of atrocity that was committed and shared in the first place. And so it goes on. Copycat crimes are rife. Look at reports into events such as the Plymouth shootings or other such terrible events, and it'll often come out that the perpetrator had a fascination with a particular type of crime that was fuelled by repeatedly viewing multiple social media posts relating to similar atrocities.
It would appear in many cases, particularly sexual ones, that the perpetrators get their gratification from sharing explicit material via social media, and I think that sharing reports like this on social media, beyond what's actually reasonable, is simply feeding the depravity.