Unfortunately it’s nothing like the 77. I personally really like the 77 the differences are substantial. Although as has been said it will certainly do the job at a much cheaper price.If it’s anything like the M77 it will be very very accurate, robust, indestructible and something you’ll never kill for as long ad you have a hole on your arse!
There aren't any Russians left around my place , when I get back , I may have to come and relieve you of one . Two is just back up , three is excessive lol .I have a bunch of them all in the Ranch model: 300bo, 7.62 Russian, 223, 6.5 CM, 308 and 300 WM. All are deadly accurate and work as they should.-Muir
In fact, i have three of the Russians
Yes the ranch uses AR mags but the standard American uses the rotary mags. I’d much prefer the AR mags but not sure if it’s possible to convert to use them?I have the 223 ranch mk1, very accurate with 50g and good enough for just over 400 yd shots on goats, bolt was rough, known as the zipper bolt due to the noise, solved with a bit of wet and dry, mags are just standard AR mags, don,t understand any problems, the stock is just a regular plastic stock, I fitted a cheek riser to mine , because of the scope fitted. Love the feel of the mk2 and the fluted barrel.
Agreed, it’s the part which lets the rifle down. Loading the mag is a faff. Feeds ok though generallyJust thought about what I had written and was about to reply the rotary mag is average to say the least
Whats people's views on the above rifle?
Well built? Accurate?
Anyone used mk1 vs mk2? Thoughts, comparisons?
Really like the look of the mk2 predator.
Ruger .204 Ruger American Predator Gen 2 | GunTrader Ruger .204 Ruger American Predator Gen 2 | GunTrader
MK1 ranch has a rotary POS mag, the MK2 has the AR ones, which would be the model to go forI have the 223 ranch mk1, very accurate with 50g and good enough for just over 400 yd shots on goats, bolt was rough, known as the zipper bolt due to the noise, solved with a bit of wet and dry, mags are just standard AR mags, don,t understand any problems, the stock is just a regular plastic stock, I fitted a cheek riser to mine , because of the scope fitted. Love the feel of the mk2 and the fluted barrel.
Mines no where near that good, terrible design, poorly built with poor materials and functions poorlyJust thought about what I had written and was about to reply the rotary mag is average to say the least
Thanks, that's reassuring. You don’t think you'll need to aftermarket triggers? Have you adjusted the factory trigger? Is the 223 10 mag capacity in standard? Im looking at 204 ; standard model 10x capacity but the predatory is 3xI was looking for a MK2 Ranch Rifle for a knockabout I could carry in the tractor when I'm feeding in the winter. I got fed up waiting and waiting and them not coming in so I bought the standard, 16" vs 20" barrel is the difference, and I think the Predator is 22". I'm very happy with it.
The trigger is absolutely fine, not as crisp as my Tikkas perhaps but totally usable. The bolt is certainly sloppier feeling than the Tikkas but again it's fine and feeds perfectly. Mine is in .223 using AR mags.
Very accurate for a cheap rifle. Will put 5 shots in pretty well .5" or less at a 100 yards.
I haven't tried a MK1 but read about the "zipper" bolt, it doesn't seem to be a problem on the MK2. Also there were complaints about very flexible stocks, the stock is OK, it doesn't touch the barrel although if you try you can make it but not in normal use. For the price no real complaints!