Hornaday bullets

Gosh - what powder and charge are giving that MV?
TR 140 which is equivalent to Vihtavuori N140. 61.5 gns. No pressure symptoms and a MV of 3275 fps with CX 110 gn. Zero 100 m and Zero again at 175 m. 3 clicks on the ballistic turret (3x 2 cm) at 200, 6x 2.5 cm at 250 m and 9 x 3cm at 300m.
 
With the 6.5 ELDX bullets, I’ve encountered inconsistent weights; in a single box, I sorted out three batches of three different weights. They are no longer my top choice—unlike Nosler bullets, which I consider decidedly superior, whenever you can actually find them.
Good analysis but back order Nosler virtual bullets are hard to shoot . I really like Nosler but Hornaday are easy to source.
 
Their shite that’s why, some love them, I hate them

Shot 100 of their copper years ago, too hard pencilled through, too many runners.

Thats why I only use barnes
Fair enough . I have always used Barnes for 18 years and the terminal effects are great but the QC has been off recently and they don't group with my rifle and 2 of my friend's rifles any more and the weights are all over the place now. If you can't hit what you are shooting at despite being careful with your reloading and shooting then there is a problem. I do respect your opinion and I am not being anti you
 
For monometal i always prefer Barnes Ttsx, however using lead ammo i get really successful results from Hornady Interlock SP and RN.
 
Shot copper over 20 years they don’t need speed
To be fair, I'd be trying to get 110gr to go pretty fast, just for flatness and down-range energy rather than anything else. It would get a bit loopy if run much slower, and the load look far from too much.

It makes more sense now we know the MV is 3275fps, rather than the eye-watering 3740fps in the OP - though I think I'd just set it about 2" high at 100yds for a zero at about 250yds - and then hold over a bit for 300yds.
It would save a lot of twiddling: but I guess it depends how big your target is.
 
Back
Top