First go at reloading, sanity check.

Alexj

Well-Known Member
Hi all,

I'm in need of some advice please.

I am about to start reloading for the first time and thought I would start with .223. I want to load some 40gn Vmax and got some N130, that seemed a sensible choice according to Viht. When I compare Hornady and Viht tables, they are close on max load and velocity, all very reassuring. I have also had a look at ApexLOAD PRO, to apply some more accurate figures to the various parameters. This is where my questions come from.
I have adjusted my case volume, barrel length etc. The recommended max loads are showing 400fps less, I expected to lose some speed with 3 and 4 inches less than the published data but that would be disappointing.

I suppose I should actually ask some questions!

1/ How close do these apps tend to correlate with reality?

2/ Do people worry about incomplete combustion? I'm not keen on powder collecting in the mod. I tried the same length barrel as the manufacturers in the app, still gets warnings over incomplete burn.

3/ Looking at the ApexLOAD PRO, would the collective go with N120? Seems to give better speeds at lower pressure and with 100% burn.

Salient info:- Norma case 31.05, 22 inch barrel .223 40gn vmax N130 or maybe N120....

Thanks in anticipation of some sage advice

Alex
 
Hi all,

I'm in need of some advice please.

I am about to start reloading for the first time and thought I would start with .223. I want to load some 40gn Vmax and got some N130, that seemed a sensible choice according to Viht. When I compare Hornady and Viht tables, they are close on max load and velocity, all very reassuring. I have also had a look at ApexLOAD PRO, to apply some more accurate figures to the various parameters. This is where my questions come from.
I have adjusted my case volume, barrel length etc. The recommended max loads are showing 400fps less, I expected to lose some speed with 3 and 4 inches less than the published data but that would be disappointing.

I suppose I should actually ask some questions!

1/ How close do these apps tend to correlate with reality?

2/ Do people worry about incomplete combustion? I'm not keen on powder collecting in the mod. I tried the same length barrel as the manufacturers in the app, still gets warnings over incomplete burn.

3/ Looking at the ApexLOAD PRO, would the collective go with N120? Seems to give better speeds at lower pressure and with 100% burn.

Salient info:- Norma case 31.05, 22 inch barrel .223 40gn vmax N130 or maybe N120....

Thanks in anticipation of some sage advice

Alex
You’re thinking too much!

Scrap the apps, buy a good reloading manual and work from that!

That process has worked for decades
 
You are over thinking it for starting out.

You have N130 use that.

Use the Viht tables initially. If there is not an exact match to the bullet you are going to use pick the same weight lead bullet. Be sure it’s lead not copper.

Full length resize. Load to the recommended cartridge overall length.

Start test loads a couple of grains off max load and go up in 0.2 gr increments.

Check for pressure signs. There are unlikely to be any.

Shoot some. Try to take you out of the test shooting. See what happens then work out where you go from there.

This is a huge topic. Just make some safe bullets, test them and load some more.

The trouble with reloading is you will get loads of different answers. Much of it will be a rehash of old theories that have since proven to be wrong.
 
3/ Looking at the ApexLOAD PRO, would the collective go with N120? Seems to give better speeds at lower pressure and with 100% burn.

You've answered your own question .3/
or use N130 if you've already got some .

Remember, all data is based on the batch of powder and the barrel it was tested in , so you may reach pressure before book max and see different velocities.

As @Norfolk Deer Search , use a good manual and learn to recognise pressure signs .

There's too much emphasis placed on internal ballistics programmes , the reality is you still need to do load development to see real world results.
 
Hi all,

I'm in need of some advice please.

I am about to start reloading for the first time and thought I would start with .223. I want to load some 40gn Vmax and got some N130, that seemed a sensible choice according to Viht. When I compare Hornady and Viht tables, they are close on max load and velocity, all very reassuring. I have also had a look at ApexLOAD PRO, to apply some more accurate figures to the various parameters. This is where my questions come from.
I have adjusted my case volume, barrel length etc. The recommended max loads are showing 400fps less, I expected to lose some speed with 3 and 4 inches less than the published data but that would be disappointing.

I suppose I should actually ask some questions!

1/ How close do these apps tend to correlate with reality?

2/ Do people worry about incomplete combustion? I'm not keen on powder collecting in the mod. I tried the same length barrel as the manufacturers in the app, still gets warnings over incomplete burn.

3/ Looking at the ApexLOAD PRO, would the collective go with N120? Seems to give better speeds at lower pressure and with 100% burn.

Salient info:- Norma case 31.05, 22 inch barrel .223 40gn vmax N130 or maybe N120....

Thanks in anticipation of some sage advice

Alex
It really does not need to be that technical.
I go up by 1% increments but otherwise pretty much what NullMac said. I started with Lee Modern Reloading and followed the method in there. I usually find a load between 1/2 and 1 MOA easily enough.
My only other advice don't load where you have distractions, be tidy and methodical. You shouldn't go far wrong.
 
You are over thinking it for starting out.

You have N130 use that.

Use the Viht tables initially. If there is not an exact match to the bullet you are going to use pick the same weight lead bullet. Be sure it’s lead not copper.

Full length resize. Load to the recommended cartridge overall length.

Start test loads a couple of grains off max load and go up in 0.2 gr increments.

Check for pressure signs. There are unlikely to be any.

Shoot some. Try to take you out of the test shooting. See what happens then work out where you go from there.

This is a huge topic. Just make some safe bullets, test them and load some more.

The trouble with reloading is you will get loads of different answers. Much of it will be a rehash of old theories that have since proven to be wrong.

Thanks NullMac, Viht does have my choice of bullet fortunately. I must admit that I'm looking forward to the journey, sad as that may seem.
 
You've answered your own question .3/
or use N130 if you've already got some .

Remember, all data is based on the batch of powder and the barrel it was tested in , so you may reach pressure before book max and see different velocities.

As @Norfolk Deer Search , use a good manual and learn to recognise pressure signs .

There's too much emphasis placed on internal ballistics programmes , the reality is you still need to do load development to see real world results.
Thanks MT, I'll have a play with what I have.
I appreciate the feedback.

A
 
Thanks MT, I'll have a play with what I have.
I appreciate the feedback.

A

There's plenty of videos on YouTube on how to correctly set up a F/L sizing die . You really need minimal shoulder bump , by that I mean no more than 0.002" in a 223 . If you size them too hard you may be looking at case separation in as few as 3 firings .

Sorry for setting you homework.

Enjoy .

P.S buy a sharpie to write the loads on the brass .
 
You've answered your own question .3/
or use N130 if you've already got some .

Remember, all data is based on the batch of powder and the barrel it was tested in , so you may reach pressure before book max and see different velocities.

As @Norfolk Deer Search , use a good manual and learn to recognise pressure signs .

There's too much emphasis placed on internal ballistics programmes , the reality is you still need to do load development to see real world results.

I would hope published data by the likes of powder manufactures use test barrels which are manufactured to minimum CIP or SAAMI dimensions for the calibre being tested as that would give maximum pressure. Or at least all shotgun test barrels i have seen are like that and full choke. Test barrels are precision things and expensive.
 
There's plenty of videos on YouTube on how to correctly set up a F/L sizing die . You really need minimal shoulder bump , by that I mean no more than 0.002" in a 223 . If you size them too hard you may be looking at case separation in as few as 3 firings .

Sorry for setting you homework.

Enjoy .

P.S buy a sharpie to write the loads on the brass .
That’s how learned how to reload almost 20 years ago now
 
Hi all,

I'm in need of some advice please.

I am about to start reloading for the first time and thought I would start with .223. I want to load some 40gn Vmax and got some N130, that seemed a sensible choice according to Viht. When I compare Hornady and Viht tables, they are close on max load and velocity, all very reassuring. I have also had a look at ApexLOAD PRO, to apply some more accurate figures to the various parameters. This is where my questions come from.
I have adjusted my case volume, barrel length etc. The recommended max loads are showing 400fps less, I expected to lose some speed with 3 and 4 inches less than the published data but that would be disappointing.

I suppose I should actually ask some questions!

1/ How close do these apps tend to correlate with reality?

2/ Do people worry about incomplete combustion? I'm not keen on powder collecting in the mod. I tried the same length barrel as the manufacturers in the app, still gets warnings over incomplete burn.

3/ Looking at the ApexLOAD PRO, would the collective go with N120? Seems to give better speeds at lower pressure and with 100% burn.

Salient info:- Norma case 31.05, 22 inch barrel .223 40gn vmax N130 or maybe N120....

Thanks in anticipation of some sage advice

Alex
There is no substitute for pressure tested printed data, and the manuals have a safety section that needs a good read and understanding before you begin to load. Any questions you have, and post here will get numerous reply's that may not agree. Good luck and feel free to ask me anything about the process.
 
I would hope published data by the likes of powder manufactures use test barrels which are manufactured to minimum CIP or SAAMI dimensions for the calibre being tested as that would give maximum pressure. Or at least all shotgun test barrels i have seen are like that and full choke. Test barrels are precision things and expensive.

It wouldnt take much in the way of internal barrel dimensions and finish to change the pressure curve I'm sure . Plus , they may be using brass with a different volume and different primers .
Just as an example , I was using Hornady brass in my 22-250 with a 50 grain Vmax . According to Hornady's data , max load for N140 is 37.2 grains . I was seeing flattered primers and ejector marks at 36.5 . I see no point in caning my brass and I had good accuracy at 36.3 . 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️
 
There's plenty of videos on YouTube on how to correctly set up a F/L sizing die . You really need minimal shoulder bump , by that I mean no more than 0.002" in a 223 . If you size them too hard you may be looking at case separation in as few as 3 firings .

Sorry for setting you homework.

Enjoy .

P.S buy a sharpie to write the loads on the brass .
I confess, I've been researching for a couple of years, mostly youtube admittedly. Eric Cortina is very helpful regarding setting up the die.

Sharpies at the ready and follow the book!!
 
There is no substitute for pressure tested printed data, and the manuals have a safety section that needs a good read and understanding before you begin to load. Any questions you have, and post here will get numerous reply's that may not agree. Good luck and feel free to ask me anything about the process.

Thanks for the reply NP and I appreciate the offer of assistance.

I'll follow the recommendations and I have access to Hornady's manual.
 
Back
Top