Last major UK gun manufacturer is now gone....

What on earth. How can a successful company just sell out like that?! Especially one that's vital to our armed forces.
A successful company can sell to whoever it likes!!! The owners have had their private collection of AI reference rifles up for sale with Devizes Gunsmith for some time. It is hardly vital to the armed forces. I am sure FN will still supply them and if not, other manufacturers will.
 
MOD is looking to procure new sniper rifles & from what I’ve seen the potential challengers to AI are in a different league. Malc was a friend of mine before he passed away & the kit he was instrumental in developing was in a different league from the stuff in service at the time. However, in recent times AI seemed more intent in pandering to the wannabe civilian market, especially in North America (no offence to our US cousins on the forum), & developing variations on a theme than looking to get ahead of the game & develop the next generation of sniper weapon system.
 
MOD is looking to procure new sniper rifles & from what I’ve seen the potential challengers to AI are in a different league. Malc was a friend of mine before he passed away & the kit he was instrumental in developing was in a different league from the stuff in service at the time. However, in recent times AI seemed more intent in pandering to the wannabe civilian market, especially in North America (no offence to our US cousins on the forum), & developing variations on a theme than looking to get ahead of the game & develop the next generation of sniper weapon system.
Yes Accuracy International's design of an aluminium chassis into which the rifle's barrelled action was fastened was a huge step forward compared to the one piece wood/composite stocks that usually housed the barrelled action for sniper rifles around the world back then in the 1970s (Remy 700, Mauser, Parker Hale etc.). But other manufacturers around the world have copied the AI chassis idea in the decades since so now that is not such a selling point. The ironic thing that gives me a chuckle is that the Victorian era Lee Enfield sniper design rifle that AI rifles actually replaced in British Army service (L42A1) was actually one step ahead of a chassis rifle in design terms as it uses a giant steel bolt to fasten the wrist of the wooden butt stock directly into a steel socket integral to the rear of the receiver making a super sturdy connection, so it didn't even need a separate chassis and receiver. A genius design that deals with accuracy issues caused by movement between the buttstock and the rear of the receiver under recoil. And in the case of these ,match-barrelled 7.62 Lee Enfields (my L39A1 is below in L42A1 homage format) the barrel was not pressure bedded by the front handguard but rather free floated, leaving little chance of the forend causing problems either (unless the front action screw comes loose). So maybe the replacements of the AI will be inspired by that ancient Lee Enfield design to use that same integral format with a few modern tweaks 😇
 

Attachments

  • L39A1 homage to L42A1.webp
    L39A1 homage to L42A1.webp
    195.7 KB · Views: 25
MOD is looking to procure new sniper rifles & from what I’ve seen the potential challengers to AI are in a different league. Malc was a friend of mine before he passed away & the kit he was instrumental in developing was in a different league from the stuff in service at the time. However, in recent times AI seemed more intent in pandering to the wannabe civilian market, especially in North America (no offence to our US cousins on the forum), & developing variations on a theme than looking to get ahead of the game & develop the next generation of sniper weapon system.
I kind of agree actually. The US market is bigger, so it makes sense on paper. But the constant delays, and a couple still born screw ups really hurt them. The AT-X, constantly being updated/fixed, with no relief for early adopters really ****ed off a lot of people, and IMHO, really hurt the brand name.

Don't get me wrong, they're still stellar rifles. But at $6K+ a rifle, and five "generations" (fixes) to the AT-X (which they finally just called the AT-XC) was a bit of a slap in the face to loyal customers. (Yes, I have a Gen 1 AT-X, that came with the non-functioning magazines, of which I had to pay to replace before they officially acknowledged the manufacturing screw up they had).
 
such a shame someone couldn't be found to take it on and keep it British , as mentioned though Dave is in his 80's now i believe so it's understandable?
 
I thought the deal was primarily with FN UK? Yes that is part of the larger group, but the release talks about protecting the UK arms manufacturing capability.

Regards

Mark
 
Back
Top