Indeed so and Barnes Wallis took the guilt of that terrible cost to his own grave. I think that the major benefit was showing that it could be done and provided a major shock to the Nazis whilst providing a significant morale boost to the British.I saw the Mohne Dam in 1967 and the repaired patch was clearly visible. I didn't know the full cost of life 'till I just watched this clip. Very sobering and thought provoking - knowing now that it only took 4 months to repair.
It was perhaps wasted lives as the RAF then never re-visited it to bomb, with conventional bombs, to disrupt the re-building work that was then needed after 617 Squadron's bravery and sacrifice.I saw the Mohne Dam in 1967 and the repaired patch was clearly visible. I didn't know the full cost of life 'till I just watched this clip. Very sobering and thought provoking - knowing now that it only took 4 months to repair.
They didn't need to. The intention was to disrupt the German manufacturing industry so as to prevent them producing replacement equipment and weapons.what I’ve never managed to understand was why the allies never conventionally re-bombed the dams during their repair phase to permanently remove their utility.
Yep that and the dreadful, and to the public at least, unacceptable casualty rate.They didn't need to. The intention was to disrupt the German manufacturing industry so as to prevent them producing replacement equipment and weapons.
Chastise was very expensive in RAF lives as it was, to repeat the raid would have been a big mistake as anti aircraft defences were increased exponentially.Albert Speer made comment about the impact of the dams being taken out so he clearly viewed it as significant, but what I’ve never managed to understand was why the allies never conventionally re-bombed the dams during their repair phase to permanently remove their utility.
FN
Besides the propaganda benefits I understand that the main benefit was that it diverted and tied up German forces to anti aircraft duties protecting similar sites.They didn't need to. The intention was to disrupt the German manufacturing industry so as to prevent them producing replacement equipment and weapons.
This is often never mentioned in accounts of the war. I've always held that the war in Europe was enabled to be won (as against not lost) by the British Merchant Navy, the US Army Airforce and the Red Army. For the US Army Airforce by forcing the Luftwaffe to fight in daylight and killing its pilots did much to achieve aerial superiority by the time of D-Day and the Soviet offensives. And the anti-aircraft cost was one million men deployed there rather than on the front lines and nearly forty thousand heavy and light AA guns which production capacity could elsewise have been used to make tank guns and anti-tank guns and field artillery. British and, much, American bombing had an effect beyond that of the buildings and factories it destroyed.Besides the propaganda benefits I understand that the main benefit was that it diverted and tied up German forces to anti aircraft duties protecting similar sites.
One for the older members. Much of the footage will be familiar but seeing it in colour is really something else.
Tragically 53 young men died in this famous raid; the Roll of Honour at the end makes for very sobering reading.
Lest we forget….