With fashion moving towards lighter rifles, who on here still stalks with an AI?

Could be mounted in the back of a pickup...!Must be really strong sticks!![]()
Ah , Yes, the good old pintle, the link tends to rattle a bit though!Could be mounted in the back of a pickup...!

I'm confused, when weren't stalking rifles lighter?With fashion moving towards lighter rifles, who on here still stalks with an AI?
With fashion moving towards lighter rifles, who on here still stalks with an AI?
Do you mean the trend for tacticool rifles in the field is actually waning and that folk are actually returning to using true sporting rifles in the field? I hadn't noticed this myself but if its true I'm all in favour of it.
Just not correct on so many levels!Hope not. "True" sporting rifles are a pile of junk that manufacturers foist on us to save cost and because they think we are stupid enough to not know any better.
The design of the sporter stock comes from the fixed sight era and is hopeless for scoped rifles. When was the last time you saw a rifle without a scope? Why did it take manufacturers 40 years to give us proper ergonomic designs? Not that the innovation came from them. How hard was it for them to envisage an adjustable stock and a grip that puts the trigger in reach. Military had been doing it for years.
Why did it take so long to get even a basic sort of bedding into factory sporters ?
Why can't you by a field rifle that other than a useless sporter profile or a hulking great varmint tube? Well you can now if you try but I only know of one or two.
Until very recently if you wanted a rifle with proper ergonomics, decent "bedding" characteristics and a barrel that behaved better than a piece of spaghetti we were stuck with tactical style rifles. Its hardly been a revolution though. Go into any gun shop and most of the designs on offer do nothing to improve the shooters experience.
Cracking rifles, love the MO3. The one piece QD rail is very nicely engineered tooAs long as you can carry it it’s not a problem
My Mauser M03 is a bit weighty but I don’t mind as the extra weight softens out the recoil and it feels like a proper rifle not like these titanium / aluminium and carbon fibre toys
Obviously never owned any Sako products then.Hope not. "True" sporting rifles are a pile of junk that manufacturers foist on us to save cost and because they think we are stupid enough to not know any better.
The design of the sporter stock comes from the fixed sight era and is hopeless for scoped rifles. When was the last time you saw a rifle without a scope? Why did it take manufacturers 40 years to give us proper ergonomic designs? Not that the innovation came from them. How hard was it for them to envisage an adjustable stock and a grip that puts the trigger in reach. Military had been doing it for years.
Why did it take so long to get even a basic sort of bedding into factory sporters ?
Why can't you by a field rifle that other than a useless sporter profile or a hulking great varmint tube? Well you can now if you try but I only know of one or two.
Until very recently if you wanted a rifle with proper ergonomics, decent "bedding" characteristics and a barrel that behaved better than a piece of spaghetti we were stuck with tactical style rifles. Its hardly been a revolution though. Go into any gun shop and most of the designs on offer do nothing to improve the shooters experience.

Hope not. "True" sporting rifles are a pile of junk that manufacturers foist on us to save cost and because they think we are stupid enough to not know any better.
The design of the sporter stock comes from the fixed sight era and is hopeless for scoped rifles. When was the last time you saw a rifle without a scope? Why did it take manufacturers 40 years to give us proper ergonomic designs? Not that the innovation came from them. How hard was it for them to envisage an adjustable stock and a grip that puts the trigger in reach. Military had been doing it for years.
Why did it take so long to get even a basic sort of bedding into factory sporters ?
Why can't you by a field rifle that other than a useless sporter profile or a hulking great varmint tube? Well you can now if you try but I only know of one or two.
Until very recently if you wanted a rifle with proper ergonomics, decent "bedding" characteristics and a barrel that behaved better than a piece of spaghetti we were stuck with tactical style rifles. Its hardly been a revolution though. Go into any gun shop and most of the designs on offer do nothing to improve the shooters experience.