Atlas bipod

NullMac

Well-Known Member
This is prompted by a thread on the Spartan bipod.

I struggle wi bipods.

Shot Harris for ever but don't really like them as I can shoot better off other types, the potential twang off the leg is an issue and loading them successfully varies with the surface so their performance also varies. Still, nice and compact, I can get the height for high heather (~12+") and don't weigh a ton.

Fortmeir is great, robust, simple, easy to use. But too wide really for in the slip up the hill, a bit on the heavy side. Not taking it off the rifle to carry as I will lose it sooner or later. £££, but worth it IHMO.

Tried the Neopod; liked it but £££ and its too low for the heather. So it went.

Will give the spartan a miss, any bipod has to be rigid and stable or its not going to do the job for me. (see the Spartan thread)

Cant adjustment is great, not a fan of pan as for me the rifle is then free to move in more than one plane, and actually I don't need it.

The best bipod I had was an old F class type. Best shooting performance by a mile. A few issues with stalking though !

So has anyone used an Atlas model that is about the same width as the Harris mount, gives me ~12+of height, lighter than a Harris, non rotating legs, notched height adjustment. No pan. Seems to me it may be somewhere between the Fortmeir and the Harris.

Pros and Cons ?
 
Sounds to me like an Atlas CAL (Cant and Lock) bipod is the one you’re after mate.
Dunno about lighter than Harris but they’re relatively comparable with the Atlas being much more stable in my opinion.
I use two CAL models and much prefer them to any other bipod I’ve used, you do pay for it however.
 
Sounds to me like an Atlas CAL (Cant and Lock) bipod is the one you’re after mate.
Dunno about lighter than Harris but they’re relatively comparable with the Atlas being much more stable in my opinion.
I use two CAL models and much prefer them to any other bipod I’ve used, you do pay for it however.
Looks like a good shout, do the legs rotate?

Edit:
Doh, no they don't. Ideal for me then ! Thanks
 
The Atlas PSR tall version with the ADM lever attachment to a small 1913 rail piece is excellent.
Looks good. I wondered about going with the standard height version and putting on leg extensions up the hill. Got pan though, but I worked out what "preloaded" meant, so maybe work out fine. Just don't like the bipods that are free to rotate
 
Have you considered Tier one? Like you I’ve tried a lot and with leg extensions the tactical with pan and tilt seems to tick most of the boxes for me. Light weight ish too.
 
Most bipods are too heavy and ruin the rifle for offhand shooting (something that seems to be taboo in the UK :eek:)

I've found quad sticks to be nearly as stable as bipods and give the user a great advantage when shooting over tall cover.

Unless it's a dedicated hill stalking/target/vermin rifle I'd recommend going with a lighter bipod (or none at all!) and a pair of sticks, which also doubles as binocular support.

Bushwear one might be Chinese made but does the job! Shots to over 300m on mine.
 
Honestly if £££ isn't a concern the best bipod by far is the MDT Cyke pod, gets lower than most others and much higher as well, especially if you go for a double pull.
Not massively heavy either, but I must admit that I still use the harris bipod for stalking as its easy to use and not too complicated so doesn't add another confusion.

Just another option,

Ben
 
Looks good. I wondered about going with the standard height version and putting on leg extensions up the hill. Got pan though, but I worked out what "preloaded" meant, so maybe work out fine. Just don't like the bipods that are free to rotate
The dial underneath locks everything solid
 
Back
Top