There may be an element of truth in these allegations but I’m sure both the BBC and their sources have performed their public duty and made the evidence available to the police. Or have they just forwarded an unsubstantiated ‘dossier’ to the MOD, in the safe knowledge that the CPS wouldn’t entertain the lack of hard evidence? As an aside though, why is it journalists’ sources are always unnamed?
Remember though, these are the same journalists who shamelessly rush to gain ‘embed’ status on operations to further their own careers; who encourage soldiers in rear areas to talk “off the record” (bribe is such an ugly word) about combat ops about which both parties have a very limited knowledge; who beg for the always limited helicopter support to fly them around the AO like VIPs (so they don’t have to stay out for too long, and thus forcing combat supplies, reinforcements and mail to move by road...), and who not so long ago happily quoted (and facilitated) Phil Shiner and his repulsive, reptilian associates.
I’ve had to host journalists on operations on a number of occasions and I have yet to meet one (of just under one hundred) whom I’d trust. Of the two organisations, I’d genuinely rather take tea with the local taliban (other varieties are available) than any so-called reporter. That said, I’d like to be a fly on the wall when the next BBC (other varieties are available) journalist turns up for his or her first ‘embedded’ meeting with troops on operations.