Chris Packham new boss of the RSPCA

Fear not.
The rspca have most likely done a "Bud-Light"
Some "box-ticker" PR wallah wanting to meet some contrived "diversity" target by appointing someone with a mental illness thinking it will encourage more donors .

Bring it on says I

Like the Bud Light poster boy I suspect this will prove to be a "cock"up
(Pun intentional)

Ade 😎
 
Y
This ^ and more.

So many members of this site fail to recognise our interests and take on CP are simply not recognised, let alone understood, by the wider Public. All they will see is a passionate, outspoken and demonstrably knowledgeable champion of wildlife and the environment. This cemented by his profile as anchor Presenter of BBC’s “Spring/Summer/Autumn/Winter Watch”.

K
Yet he is naught but a TV presenter
Same as Attenborough, he of the "Walrus' committing suicide as they have no ice to live on" scam film
Said Walrus were trying to escape Polar Bears. Sneaky camera angles did not show that.
Walrus do not live on ice pack- they are too fat. They live on shingle beaches and eat shell fish-
but no need to let inconvenient little things such as facts get in the way of sensational telly.
(Got to think of viewing-figures and climate change scare-mongering haven't we?)

Packham is the same - though a much less skilled film maker.

The national (buffer) treasure Attenborough is also not a biologist, he like Packham is a TV presenter and "naturalist" whatever that is supposed to mean.

There are more than one or two on here who have far more knowledge and experience of the natural World than both of these two clowns put together.

Ade😎
 
Last edited:
perhaps we should all ask (as I have just.done) the RSPCA if they intend euthanising more domestic cats from now on, as this has always been a particular hate of Mr packham, who has even said there should be a cull of cats, and a sterilisation campaign to grossly reduce their numbers, or are they promoting taking young hawks from their nests to keep in cardboard boxes until they die, tomorrow i intend to close my account with the Natwest as I was not aware they were one of the RSPCA's sponsors.
 
Y

Yet he is naught but a TV presenter
Same as Attenborough, he of the "Walrus' committing suicide as they have no ice to live on" scam film
Said Walrus were trying to escape Polar Bears. Sneaky camera angles did not show that.
Walrus do not live on ice pack- they are too fat. They live on shingle beaches and eat shell fish-
but no need to let inconvenient little things such as facts get in the way of sensational telly.
(Got to think of viewing-figures and climate change scare-mongering haven't we?)

Packham is the same - though a much less skilled film maker.

The national (buffer) treasure Attenborough is also not a biologist, he like Packham is a TV presenter and "naturalist" whatever that is supposed to mean.

There are more than one or two on here who have far more knowledge and experience of the natural World than both of these two clowns put together.

Ade😎
Naturalist .... is that not a naked naturist with an added AL
 
David Attenborough read Natural Sciences at Cambridge. Packham read Zoology at Southampton. Both could therefore make some claim to be scientists.
Attenborough has been a source of inspiration for me since the day of "Zoo Quest". Packham comes up with some daft things and I wonder if he is well served by his researchers or whoever prepares his material. He is a difficult chap to like but evidently many do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VSS
Back
Top