Its disgusting isn't it? To paraphrase Groucho; "We have our principles but if you pay us enough we have some more"£130 at my local GP. They said they'd at first "made a practice decision on principle" not to to do it. Then come the time I requested my medical records they said they now would do them,. For £130. To which I commented that I was pleased that they didn't sell their virtues cheap.
£104 cash only!Wonder whyThis has probably been done time and time again but curious on what different areas are charging for this service?
Father in law had his done in the next village over for £60, whilst ours is £100.
Seems crazy that there obviously isn’t a structured way of pricing this but making it up.
I understand this is done for public safety but overall for what work actually is entailed in this process seems ridiculous for this amount, opposed to what the firearms dept. do for the same fee. And in some instances a significant amount less !
I feel this would be an awful lot fairer for government to regulate the costs of this and to charge more for the firearms dept. to do the work they do.
Don’t get me wrong , I’d rather neither charged anymore!!
Just curious on others experiences.
So a plumber has a £100 call out fee and that’s OK but a fully qualified doctor doing work outside of the NHS (I.e. private work) cannot charge £130.Its disgusting isn't it? To paraphrase Groucho; "We have our principles but if you pay us enough we have some more"
So a plumber has a £100 call out fee and that’s OK but a fully qualified doctor doing work outside of the NHS (I.e. private work) cannot charge £130.
Interesting perspective on what people are worth you have.
Apples and oranges comparison ... and I note the plumber in your statement lacks the "fully qualified" description. The input from your 'fully qualified' doctor is what? Five minutes reading a computer screen and ten seconds writing with a biro?So a plumber has a £100 call out fee and that’s OK but a fully qualified doctor doing work outside of the NHS (I.e. private work) cannot charge £130.
Interesting perspective on what people are worth you have.
You're going to want a Dr, paramedics won't insert a stent!Apples and oranges comparison ... and I note the plumber in your statement lacks the "fully qualified" description. The input from your 'fully qualified' doctor is what? Five minutes reading a computer screen and ten seconds writing with a biro?
It's context isn't it? If my house is being flooded from a burst pipe then a plumber (hopefully, fully qualified?) is worth more to me than a doctor. If I'm having a heart attack then quite obviously I'm going to want a paramedic!![]()
My point is that they agreed in principle as a practice not to get involved then when it appeared that someone else would do it for a fee they had a sudden change of 'principles'. Also I would add that I don't fund AA Aardvark plumbing routinely through my taxes but I do fund the local GP surgery so for what amounts to a few minutes of light admin I would expect a service for a reasonable fee. £30 perhaps.So a plumber has a £100 call out fee and that’s OK but a fully qualified doctor doing work outside of the NHS (I.e. private work) cannot charge £130.
Interesting perspective on what people are worth you have.
Yep, and I'm pretty certain my local GP isn't inserting stents at the surgery? I'm guessing the odds of me having a random heart attack in a hospital operating theatre (unless I'm already under the knife) will be almost zero? The chances of there being a qualified doctor, complete with stent and all the gubbins, at the location where I have a heart attack is also almost zero (and I'm guessing they wouldn't want to be doing the deed at the side of the road?). What I need in an out of hospital medical emergency is someone with the kit and skill to keep me alive until I can get to hospital. That will be a fully tooled up paramedic, ECP or similar.You're going to want a Dr, paramedics won't insert a stent!