Thread going down slope.


There’s been far worse done during these current demos. without any penalty for most law breakers!I respectfully disagree. The outrage and indignation that this offence caused (and I note your mitigation) warrant a sanction beyond that of an FPN.
The Courts - whilst not heeding the press (nor should they) cannot fail to notice (and take notice of) the temperature of the country - and in that, they have a duty to do so.
Violating the national memorial to all our war dead is a grievous insult to the entire nature. Drunkenness, ignorance, stupidity is no defence. It's treason. Death penalty. Hang him.
I'll volunteer to pull the lever now Mr Pierrepoint is no longer with us.
And yet you can't though can you because then you and your little special friend wouldn't be able to trawl what I post and have your tittering little digs could you .?
Another who would no doubt never repeat what they type in person.
That's too touchy - I was saying it didn't matter which Police memorial it was not that Yvonne Fletcher or anyone else didnt matter, or any memorial come to that. Jumping to incorrect conclusions was precisely my point about armed Police officers and 'off-safe' firearms.It does matter.
A memorial is an object which serves as a focus for the memory or the commemoration of something, usually an influential, deceased person or a historical, tragic event.
PC Keith Palmer, GM was a British police officer who was posthumously awarded the George Medal, the second highest award for gallantry "not in the face of the enemy". Though unarmed, he stopped a knife-wielding terrorist from entering the Palace of Westminster during the 2017 Westminster attack; he died from wounds he received in this attack.
It does matter...
That's too touchy - I was saying it didn't matter which Police memorial it was not that Yvonne Fletcher or anyone else didnt matter, or any memorial come to that. Jumping to incorrect conclusions was precisely my point about armed Police officers and 'off-safe' firearms.
Should be told dont do it again, and the council should them apologise for shutting the toilets.
The world has gone mad, prosecuting a block for having a **** in the street, but not prosecuting the protesters.
Neil.
Councils have shut public toilets, what did they expect to happen.Protesting is legal. Pis*ing in the street is illegal.
Protesting may be legal outside a pandemic, but the police have issued fixed penalty notices for breaking lockdown rules and social distancing, is not public groups, crowds not banned under the public health restrictions at this time?Protesting is legal. Pis*ing in the street is illegal.
Councils have shut public toilets, what did they expect to happen.
As for protesting being legal, no its not, not when we are supposed to be in lockdown, and not when the protesters are destroying and defacing monuments.
Neil.
I completely understand your position, but wonder if I may ask your opinion on something.It is about a drunken idiot who came to London looking to "protect statues" although he was unable to articulate which statues. Who then urinated in a public place upside the memorial to a murdered Police Officer.
Protesting may be legal outside a pandemic, but the police have issued fixed penalty notices for breaking lockdown rules and social distancing, is not public groups, crowds not banned under the public health restrictions at this time?
Then you have the thousands at raves again the majority have not been sanctioned. They look to have made an example of him 14days in prison, rather than a fine.
So, if this guy was given 14 days then what sentence would you say that the BLM protesters should receive for actually deliberately defacing the memorials with paint etc? Please don't feel obliged to answer, I'm just curious for an "inside view" on how theywillshould be dealt with.
Thanks.I very much hope that in the ongoing investigations, (that always follow riots or disorder) will bring to justice all of those that have committed offences. It is often not possible or wise to arrest suspects in the middle of a public order situation.
Whilst sentencing is a matter for the Courts, I would hope that they take into consideration intent and where there is "criminal intent" and not drunken, badly made choices, sentence accordingly.
I really like and agree with this one, although mixed in with the disinfectant, I would add a bright blue dye, with a half life of about two years.I would be entirely happy if all of the protesters of any variety had been tear-gassed, sprayed down with disinfectant and each slapped with a fine for breaching lockdown rules - and those found defacing memorials or assaulting policemen in prison for the longest term the law permits without early-release.