I am, courtesy of YouTube and IG, seeing an increasing number of ‘Professionals’ not gralloch beasts at the site of the shot, but recover them to the larder to do so. This is presumably in order to limit foreign objects entering the carcass, however quite clearly some of the beasts shot are going an hour with green offal still in.
Is this considered best practice now? It’s been many years since I did DSC2.
I was always told gralloch and bleed immediately as both blood, and the stomach/intestines seeping into the carcass were contaminates, delaying this process for whatever reason is surely sub optimal?
My own thoughts are gralloch in situ, if it’s a longer drag then utilise a short incision, and not open the neck up. If a beast is in a muddy area then quickly extract to a set point and gralloch in the clean area.
I appreciate temperature is a major factor, but it isn’t often in England we have temperatures far into single figures…even in winter.
Thoughts? Are we over thinking this, trying to avoid a few twigs getting in, but risking much worse. Genuinely interested to hear, especially off those routinely performing larder grallochs.
Is this considered best practice now? It’s been many years since I did DSC2.
I was always told gralloch and bleed immediately as both blood, and the stomach/intestines seeping into the carcass were contaminates, delaying this process for whatever reason is surely sub optimal?
My own thoughts are gralloch in situ, if it’s a longer drag then utilise a short incision, and not open the neck up. If a beast is in a muddy area then quickly extract to a set point and gralloch in the clean area.
I appreciate temperature is a major factor, but it isn’t often in England we have temperatures far into single figures…even in winter.
Thoughts? Are we over thinking this, trying to avoid a few twigs getting in, but risking much worse. Genuinely interested to hear, especially off those routinely performing larder grallochs.
Last edited:
