March scopes; are they any good?

Cloudhopper

Well-Known Member
I'm planning to have a go at some longer range targets and I think my hunting scope will need upgrading to a more tactical type but still suitable for hunting and fairly light. After surveying the market the March 2.5-25 X 42 looks like the ideal all-rounder, especially mounted using Optilock ringmounts. I checked out some on-line reviews and one on-line source from the US was less than complimentary. This got me thinking that I hardly see any for sale or mentioned on SD or elsewhere.

Has anyone got one? What's it like? How does it compare with top end products from Zeiss, Swaro, S & B etc?
CH
 
I wish I'd not swapped mine. Only thing I found was mine (10x mag min) was hopeless in low light and was a real pain to try and find foxes in the lamp. However, for shooting long range bunnies, crows etc and dialling in blah blah blah it was excellent and I do miss it. Get an illuminated ret.
 
I use a 5-50x56 . I have shot everything from foxs at 5 yards to deer.......waaay out there . I love it , and the mtr-2 reticle is awesome.
I thing the 5-50 really is a do-it-all scope.
 
Thanks for all your replies.

Caorach, not exactly a glowing report. But, as you say, it's all about priorities and the weight of most if not all the competitors count them out for hunting.
CH
 
Contrary to the precision rifle blog reviews , i always thought march had a really good range of reticles.
The march tested also had the smallest objective out of all the scopes .
 
Back
Top