I think if you watch the video in its entirety you'll see that
Fieldsports Channel actually do a very good job of toeing the very feint line of impartiality.
Whilst it's not my cup of tea in any way shape or form, that does not mean that it doesn't deserve to be covered by journalists in a manner which feeds curiosity and awareness for the viewer. The beauty of life (and where we live) is that we have an apparent free choice to choose what we do/do not like. There will be a vast number of people, perhaps with backgrounds similar to those shown in the footage, that thoroughly enjoy this type of shooting and applaud that a professional media outfit has taken the time to show their cause.
As I am sure others will agree, many things go on in the world
legally that I do not agree with - both in and out of the field sports world. However, I think that to say that it shouldn't be covered by a media outlet in its entirety is unfair. In my personal opinion, I think all 95% of media surrounding the shooting world is going to be met negatively by those that just simply oppose shooting - there's very little you can do to combat that and unfortunately just something we have to live with.
Open-mindedness to hearing one's views/way of life is, in my opinion, exactly how you find your own moral/ethical compass.
For those of you who are interested, Charlie Jacoby (founder/narrator of Fieldsports Channel), did a great podcast with Tweedl. They talk about similar things and how journalism in the Fieldsports arena has developed. In particular, they comment on seeing/reporting on things you may not personally agree with. Here's the link if you have Spotify (
HERE)
Hatch