Price of Second hand scopes

Tulloch

Well-Known Member
There is no secret in the last ten years I have reviewed and used some of the best scopes on the market and I have seen a trend happening within the scope world where what would be deemed high-end scopes even 2 to 3 years ago are now becoming far more affordable, non more than the night vision market.

The problem though is the second hand market, I for one have never really been able to buy highend scopes brand new, so testing and borrowing from the manufacturers to do reviews allowed me to play with the expensive toys, in view of this the only option for me personally buying secondhand, like many, was a better option to be able to own good glass, but the second hand market is swamped now with guys looking for original retail value of the scopes they bought 5 years ago and now it is more viable to buy new instead of old.

I understand that in times gone buy that buying a scope was an investment and good glass held its money but things have sincerely changed. Here is a couple of examples of what I mean.

A lot of guys are still trying to sell their second hand Zeiss Diavari's for around £700 to £1000, original retail for a 3-12x was £1300, now arguably yes the Diavari is a good scope but Zeiss updated their Conquest range in the last few years with the V4 now being sold for between £575 (R Macleods and Son) to £900 (in other places), the Conquest V4 stats are pretty much the same as the Diavari, so is spending the same money on a second hand scope as you would on a new one with better features really worth it?

The same has happened with the nightvision and thermal markets so it is not just clear glass where the issue is with, I saw an advert (not on here) the other day of a guy wanting £2800 for his Quantum XD50 that is 5 years old, but, you can buy a brand new Helion for less money, it makes no sense.

Don't get me wrong I understand the value of good glass, my first decent scope was a Swaro Habicht and it cost me £750 secondhand, I bought and still own a Meopta 7x50 for £150 from a member on here and it is still a fantastic scope and prompted me to buy a 3-12x50 Artemis 2000 again that I still use and got for £250 so the bargains are still out there but they are getting harder and harder to find within the second hand market.

Recently I thought with the price of glass coming down I have managed to buy new and it has been phenomenal to get access to equipment that allow me to shoot longer ranges a lot easier.

I know in the end I understand it is just people trying to redeem the majority cost of their old stuff to buy new, but in many cases it is hard to understand the justification. At the moment the secondhand scope market is NOT a buyers market and sellers refusing to budge on pricing means it is not a market at all.

Bit of advice when selling, look at what is available new before you think about how much you spent on your equipment, there is no point trying to sell a piece of equipment at a higher price than what you can get similar or better for new.

Just a thought.
 
Last edited:
what amuses me about nv stuff is not only some of the outrageous prices, claims, and often origin of the latest "must have super-dooper" nv item,, but the speed that the next one comes onto the market. nevertheless well proven and honest reliable kit in the field remains sought after and deservedly so in some models/types, while the frauds soon get discovered and fall by the wayside.
 
what amuses me about nv stuff is not only some of the outrageous prices, claims, and often origin of the latest "must have super-dooper" nv item,, but the speed that the next one comes onto the market. nevertheless well proven and honest reliable kit in the field remains sought after and deservedly so in some models/types, while the frauds soon get discovered and fall by the wayside.
The problem with the nightvision market is that much of we get in the commercial market is old tech re-jigged to make it cheaper,

The Chinese (mainly due to licensing that allows them to make them for the original designers) once patent is lapsed have flooded the market at the moment making it harder to warrant some of the pricing, they have done the same with day scopes and optics so we get the perception they are "knock-offs" but in fact they arre the same products we have been paying thousands forfor the last 10 years.

Nightvision products are quickly coming down in price with thermals that are completely usable in the field being under a grand to scopes that have updated sensors.

Genuinely though digital nightvision has become popular as camera sensors are easier and cheaper to manufacture with many products using the same sensor, albeit with IR filters, that you will find in midranged DSLR's and Bridge cameras. The tubed market however remains expensive because of the materials are harder to come by but does not mean it is better as much this technology has not changed since the 60's.

Thermal is a different product though and as it is not really classed as NV as it can be used daytime again sensors are becoming more powerful thus keeping newer prices higher but at the cheaper end we are just seeing old tech in new bodies with some new features., if you know what I mean.

I predict, trust me lol , There is going to be a big shake up in both the scope and nightvision market as people like Bushnell and Leupold are upping their game and bringing developement more in-house and Zeiss as it moves more into the mil-spec and competition market we will see some heavy advances in scope technology. The use of different gasses to enhance scope ability and with Pulsar new products and slimlining of their scope bodies adding new features like built in LRF's we can see the Chinese developing similar designs.

But one thing we have to be careful is liberal legislation as that will hamper things and honestly Brexit wont help the price from Europe to the UK.

But that deviates from the OP a bit but does highlight the fact that we are talking future developments and pricing can we really ask for original retail pricing for stuff that we have bought 2 to 3 scope generations ago and longer?
 
Last edited:
I have long argued similarly about pre-owned pricing Tulloch, it has long been a bug bear of mine. The number of purchases that I have walked away from because the seller would not understand simple economics is frightening.

If you look at the mathematics of your example above, the Diavari at £1300 new.

That £1300 included VAT at 20%, so the actual "value" or "worth" of the scope was actually £1040. Once paid on the initial purchase the VAT cannot be levied again so the re-seller should be basing their new-value on that £1040. The additional £260 was a tax levied on the original purchaser for buying new, I am not interested in repaying that for them!

My personal limits for second-hand gear (disregarding rare, or otherwise very-difficult-to-attain items) floats between 50% to 70% of new value depending on desirability and condition. Any more than that and I am walking away. Like you say, it is increasingly a buyers market...
 
Like you say, it is increasingly a buyers market...

I totally agree, and as you say it is a buyers market IF you are buying new making the secondhand market un-achievable if sellers decide they want to recoup even 80 to 90% of their money back.

When I am talking about scopes I am talking about aged within the last 15 even 20 years I am not talking rare and antiques but even so I saw a beautiful KAhles 6x42 ( a scope I used to own) going for £60 now this scope was made in 1986 but was still top of the game well into the 90's and later and in good condition would 100% usable today, phenomenal scope but sadly I was sniped at the last second , Ohwell lol
 
I really don't think there are many, if any, significant improvements going to happen with glass scopes.
The top brands charge the prices they do because - well, they're the top brands!
The top products from those top brands are now not selling on glass quality, they're selling on things like dialling reticles, built in range finders, barometers, inclinometers etc - that tells you that as far as the glass and coatings go - they've pretty much hit the limit
A theoretical scope that transmitted 100% of the light that entered the objective lens wouldn't be noticeably brighter than a real scope that "only" transmits 95%
There is no doubt that the top brand scopes do use the best glass, best materials and are constructed using high levels of quality control.
But the selling price is more a reflection of the back up and service they provide in the rare event of something going wrong.
There are lots of mid price scopes that are near to the performance of the top brands, but cost less than half the price and IMHO are much better value for money.

Cheers

Bruce
 
I totally agree, and as you say it is a buyers market IF you are buying new making the secondhand market un-achievable if sellers decide they want to recoup even 80 to 90% of their money back.

When I am talking about scopes I am talking about aged within the last 15 even 20 years I am not talking rare and antiques but even so I saw a beautiful KAhles 6x42 ( a scope I used to own) going for £60 now this scope was made in 1986 but was still top of the game well into the 90's and later and in good condition would 100% usable today, phenomenal scope but sadly I was sniped at the last second , Ohwell lol

I would love to own and use any of the somewhat dated, but excellent optics of yesteryear, Kahles, pecar, weaver, and of course many of the older schmidt and bender, any of those for £60 would make me happy. :thumb:
 
I completely agree regarding silly prices for old kit, but clearly someone is buying it! But I'm not buying 'expensive' glass new or second hand either way! ;)

If I were selling I'd want to get the best price that i could get, regardless of what I thought it was worth. It's a sellers market, and that won't change whilst people are buying the goods! Fair play to the sellers - why should they sell for less than people are happy to pay?!?
 
I completely agree regarding silly prices for old kit, but clearly someone is buying it! But I'm not buying 'expensive' glass new or second hand either way! ;)

If I were selling I'd want to get the best price that i could get, regardless of what I thought it was worth. It's a sellers market, and that won't change whilst people are buying the goods! Fair play to the sellers - why should they sell for less than people are happy to pay?!?
I get what your saying, although, what I am getting at is that when you have new items from the same manufacturer that has better features being sold new for less than some sellers are selling secondhand, it makes no sense to me.
 
The Op seems to be forgetting any peice of kit is worth as much as someone's prepared to pay for it and if that's very close to the original price it may well be because the item has not been bettered at least as far as the purchaser is concerned.

K
No, I totally understand, but what is happening is people are selling say Zeiss Diavari secondhand double the price of a brand new Conquest which comes with warranties etc etc , It makes the second hand market stagnant and many sellers find themselves having to keep the scopes or become disappointed.
 
I agree that second hand stuff is expensive when compared with new (in my opinion of course) but at the end of the day the value of anything is the price agreed between a willing buyer and a willing seller. The market is King.
 
No, I totally understand, but what is happening is people are selling say Zeiss Diavari secondhand double the price of a brand new Conquest which comes with warranties etc etc , It makes the second hand market stagnant and many sellers find themselves having to keep the scopes or become disappointed.

But if these seller really want to sell they will drop the price to a level where the product will sell, so it appears that while they want to sell they don't need to sell.
 
When the Swarovski PH series was superseded by the Z6i the American retailers couldn't offload them fast enough. At the time the exchange rate was also very good. Fast forward 10 years and they command higher prices than what I paid new and now there has been the Z6i II and Z8i out they still show no sign of easing of prices.

So you might truly say Swarovski is an investment.
 
The market value of anything is the price struck between a willing seller and a willing buyer. If you can't buy a second hand product at a price satisfactorily (to you) reduced from new, then buy new or look for an alternative.

Edited to add that my wristwatch is worth about 30 times the price it was bought for when new, and more than twice the retail price of its current version.
 
It will and does come down to the name on the scope irrespective of the scopes individual stats to many or most customers........oooh! a Diavari eh...noice!

IE Having a rifle with a DIAVARI mounted on it is seen to be better than the same rifle with a CONQUEST mounted on it....... aaaaah its just a Conquest.
 
Swarovski Habicht and 8 x 56 fixed power scopes appear to be the worst for being advertised for unrealistic prices.
The other thing that annoys me is comments like 'that's almost too cheap' on items that are anything but! Not surprisingly the better educated amongst us don't buy the item and it's bumped numerous times rather than being reduced.
If you're not interested in the item then please keep quiet about it!
 
Back
Top