I think that, yes, the use of these things should be banned. But I also think that, no, the use of lead shot should not be. And a judicial review should have been threatened over mandatory additional GP input beyond the Home Office guidance manual. And legal insurance retained to protect members' interests.
And that BASC resources would have been better directed to the latter - or GP medicals - or continuing insurance for non-renewal - rather than the former.
Not one but three failures to be effective. Yet, hey ho, let's divert some of Marford Mill's resources to back a call for a ban Chinese sky lanterns.
There's some would call it pathetic. But I don't care I'm with the CPSA. For they, CPSA, provide cover not only for clay pigeon shooting but also for vermin, game shooting and stalking AND continue as a member benefit to give the legal insurance cover for non-renewal of SGCs that BASC withdrew.