Does anyone know what the deference is between the Pulsar XM30S and the new XM30F. Apart from price and a Sony display are there any other key differences?
As already mentioned above by Dari, there really isn't much difference between the two. Perhaps a slightly better image on the XM30F. The latter also uses slightly less battery, but the difference is nearly negligible overall.
As already mentioned above by Dari, there really isn't much difference between the two. Perhaps a slightly better image on the XM30F. The latter also uses slightly less battery, but the difference is nearly negligible overall.
Thanks for the input people. Ended up going for a XM30F, used it for the first time yesterday and I’m over the moon. The Munjac doe wasn’t as impressed!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.