This .270...or that .270...

Just a follow-up & thoughts - I have now been using the .270 (new Tikka T3x) for a year-ish. Every deer I have shot at has dropped within < 10 metres and only needed one bullet. Only 7 or 8 so clearly I have no large data set but it has - weirdly - given me WAY more confidence in my shooting as I know that the .270 will bring whatever it is down. And given that, I seem to make better shots. Which, to me, is interesting.

Over the years, I found that - I think every time - with my .243 I needed/preferred a second close-range head-shot to end it all as the animal was alive when I got to it.

The .270 is hilariously good at doing its job, in the short time I have had it and in the relatively few cases where I have used it.

I'd still be entirely happy to use my old .243, but it is not getting out anymore. For someone like me, who is shooting a few deer per year, who stalks alone and who does not have a dog, the .270 is turning out to be quite the tool. Delighted, I must say.

I just note this for anyone pondering if the .270 is a good option (I pondered the same). Crack on!
 
Yes an old rifle is like an old car...they come out go to car shows and when it rains scuttle off home. 🤪
Answer me this please.. if the old rifles are that good why did the makers bother to change?
I have in the shed a 350 Jap Grass track bike (built by my Dad in 1970) It will run ok but put it up against a modern 350 and you will only see them coming past you. I have a 90 year old lathe and 70 year old mill but they won't hold tolerance like a modern one:tiphat:
Partly to sell new rifles and keep themselves in business!
 
Back
Top