I have owned three Browning A bolts and, a few niggles aside, liked them – but not enough to still have them.
Currently have a second hand Sako 75 and looks like it’s a rifle I will be keeping. Previously had a Tikka 595 and only parted with it as needed to go with other owner – it was on joint tickets and a shared rifle.
The worse thing about the T 595 was that it does shade your perceptions of the T3 range. They are simply not built the same way – don’t mean that in a particularly derogatory way, just as fact.
On the courses I see hundreds of rifles each year. Other than rifles bodged by owners ( WD40 is not a good bedding compound

), the T3s all perform pretty well.
I had looked at the X bolt with interest, but not seen one to handle properly in the flesh until the last course – which had two candidates with them. One 243 the other 270.
The 243 had all kinds of problems, which from limited inspection seemed to centre ( no pun intended ) on the barrel. On taking off the moderator it was clear to the naked eye that the bore was not concentric with the barrel. More worryingly for a factory threaded rifle, the threading was off and the crown pretty poor – all possibly stemming from the bore issue. It shouldn’t have got out the factory and the dealer concerned should have spotted it – it really was that obvious.
That aside, the 270 shot ok. But I couldn’t shake a feeling of disappointment – akin to the Tikka 595/ T3 mindset above. My Browning Medallion and Euro’s where really well put together. Whilst there were design niggles, the engineering was solid. The X bolt just seemed to exude a feeling that it was designed by engineers briefed to production criteria – rather than shooters. It just could have been better. As I say, that should be read as highly subjective given my mindset.
Got to say that from experience Browning UK support is pretty poor. Then too I cant be the only one that laments the day GMK took over from JLS in terms of supporting Tikka.