ive currently got a s&b 8x56 which is great in low light, but i like the idea of the lumm dot as i tend to loose the crosshairs on my s&b against the black fallow.
also a little more mag wouldnt go a miss sometimes, anybody got a 3/12x50 duralyt lumminated ?????????????
sorry to jack the thread 375mag
Nothing cheap about the quality, to be honest, i'd rather buy two of these 3x12x50 I,R's than one of the more expensive, all you seem to get for double the money is whistles and bells, even more to go wrong and to worry about, i think if i'd bought one with adjustable paralax, target turrets etc i'd only become anal about the bloody thing and be forever adjusting it, for me, mine shoots straight every time, doesn't loose zero even if i accidently knock it taking it in and out of the cabinet and the optics will far out perform me, as i've said before, i was shooting foxes on the corn stubble without a lamp, what more could you want out of a scope?Hi Tikkat3
Im afraid im to far away ,just wondered why such a bargain price is the quality still there on the cheaper scopes ?
i too have these scopes and prefer the zeissI have the 3-12x50 illuminated I also have the swaro z6 2-12x50 and I prefer the zeiss
Scott9.3x62, just wondering if you could answer a question for me? how do you guys shoot a moving kangaroo in the middle of a bounce? do you use a bipod with sprung legs?I've got a 3-12x50 illum. Haven't used it yet but have compared it at twilight with my Zeiss Victory x56, my Zeiss Classic 8x56 and my Swaro and I think it'll prove to be excellent value.
