Dispatch .

You do know that Bovine TB carcasses go into the food chain every day......

Is that all carcasses or just the ones that have been reactors etc when tested but show no signs of TB when slaughtered ??

I think that we all know that the test is unreliable and the majority of animals that are culled are false reactions , I have always understood that any that are found to have lesions are removed from the food chain and destroyed
 
Last edited:
Is that all carcasses or just the ones that have been reactors etc when tested but show no signs of TB when slaughtered ??

I think that we all know that the test is unreliable and the majority of animals that are culled are false reactions , I have always understood that any that are found to have lesions are removed from the food chain and destroyed

The current skin test is reliable. Its sensitivity is about 80% specificity, high 90s. This means that positive cattle probably are positive, but about 20% of negative testing cows actually have TB. This varies depending on what the background level of TB is, but the figures are reasonably accurate. At slaughter, lesions are trimmed unless they are so severe as to lead to condemnation.
 
food standards agency carry out post mortem inspection in abattoirs , the lesions on the ribs look like localised abscess properly caused by an injury caused when the animal was young
 
food standards agency carry out post mortem inspection in abattoirs , the lesions on the ribs look like localised abscess properly caused by an injury caused when the animal was young


Have you seen the lungs? Hardly any normal tissue left. Very unlikely localised damage IMO.
 
food standards agency carry out post mortem inspection in abattoirs , the lesions on the ribs look like localised abscess properly caused by an injury caused when the animal was young

The lesions were not localised , that was just a couple that were easy to show , there were more on both sides and higher up towards the spine
 
Back
Top