Return to the bluebell wood for a muntjac (but with a new hat)

In what is now starting to look like a regular pattern if not a tradition, three weeks ago, the week before Mrs PM's birthday, I headed back to Willie_Gunn's bluebell woods to see if I could supply a muntjac for the barbecue. Part of me thinks that's just an excuse, but if I think about it, that is really the whole point of hunting, so it's not an excuse, it's a reason. However, there is no doubt that I absolutely love stalking in that wood along the top of a hill in Oxfordshire, especially in the Spring when it is carpeted with bluebells. I'd happily make up any old ropey story to return. Contrary to last year, when I was lucky to arrive in the late afternoon and stalk during the only part of the day when it didn't rain, this time it had been bone dry for a long time, the fields dry and cracked, the usually deep puddles in the tractor tracks empty.

As on previous occasions, we stalked up a path along the base of the hill, shielded from the field between us and the wood by a line of trees, peeping through gaps in the foliage once in a while to see if any deer were raiding the pheasant feeders on the other side. There were a few pheasants, and as always a hare or two, but no deer. So we duly crossed the field and entered the wood. This part always feels like walking through a portal into another world to which senses have to adjust. The sounds are muffled (except stepping on twigs!), dappled sunlight lands on the forest floor, fallen trees and bluebells, and as we moved ever so slowly along deer tracks, we stopped every few steps to peer into the undergrowth and between tree trunks to try to spot a muntjac before it spotted us.

After an hour or so, it's hard to tell, time isn't the same in the woods, we finally spotted a buck to our right, but it had spotted us first. I could see the big V-shape of its ears atop a long slender neck, straight up as the beady little eyes examined us, but there was no time for a shot. In a series of barks, it bounded off into the trees, alerting the whole wood of our presence. We waited in case it came back round, but obviously it didn't. At this point, W_G said that we'd better stop for a while and let the wood settle, so we stood in the middle of a circle of trunks created by an old coppice I believe, which provided a kind of natural hide. Back to back, we waited and scanned all around us.

"Turn around veeeery slowly" murmured W_G. I slowly turned, and not twenty metres away was a muntjac doe, slowly browsing her way towards us, oblivious to our presence. She was moving from left to right, and as slowly and discretely as possible, i tried to reach for my phone to take a picture of this charming encounter, but not ten metres away, she spotted us and moved off. At which point I remembered that I was supposed to try and shoot muntjac, not take their portraits! But Willie_Gunn of all people understands that sort of reaction I believe. Either way, we had seen some deer, there was at least two more hours of light left, we'd find another.

We paused on the opposite side of the wood, just inside, before stepping out into the open. Across the meadow was a patch of wood that often holds a couple of bucks, but not today. A lone hen pheasant was pecking away inside an old toppled feeder. Then W_G spotted another muntjac doe browsing along the edge of the wood, zig-zagging in and out of the undergrowth and tall wood. He stepped back (remembering the bashing his ears had taken from my drilling last year), I raised the drilling on the sticks, and after a little shifting found the doe in the fixed 6 power scope, not easy as it was no further than twenty metres away, head down, and head on unfortunately. She vanished. A couple of minutes later, she reappeared, body hidden by the grass, then turned back to face the wood. W_G made a sound, she stopped for a second, now almost filling the eyepiece behind the thick No1 post reticle, and BANG! It sprang forwards, crashed into a bush, where I could hear some thrashing, then silence. "How did that feel?" asked W_G who I don't think could see the doe from where he'd been standing. "Fine, it's dead. I don't think I'd miss at ten metres". And yet... there was blood at the shot site, but also green... Oh come on, at ten metres!!? Ah well, that's hubris for you. The doe was in the bushes, two metres away. We pulled it out and actually, it had been hit exactly where it should be, just a bit low as the barrel and scope axes haven't yet converged at such a short range. However some of the innards had been sucked through the diaphragm and the exit wound, a consequence of a 150gr hollowpoint on a small deer at stupidly short range.

IMAG2133 by pinemarten, on Flickr

As I set about gralloching the deer, I realised that for the first time I wasn't nervous about making a mess of it under W_G's eyes. It was easy if not all that elegant. This is my 12th deer, the fifth muntjac and 4th from this wood, and I suppose I've reached critical mass of gralloching experience. This one was heavily pregnant, and although I still find that unpleasant, I've also overcome my squeamishness and can approach it as matter-of-fact process. In the bag it went, mission accomplished, we have ourselves a barbecue!

IMAG2136~2 by pinemarten, on Flickr

(The above photo is especially for 8x57 who complained about my hat last year: I have a new one!)

Once again, my heartfelt thanks to Willie_Gunn for the repeated privilege of stalking with him in this unique piece of ground, and for all that he's taught me over repeated visits. I hope that I can one day return part of the favour.
 
Last edited:
Well told. However, I thought a new hat like that needed a blooded twig or something in the hatband after a successful stalk?
 
A very enjoyable read as always & a pleasant distraction for me during my dull day of photographic retouching. I've still yet to see a live muntjac which I must rectify sometime soon.
 
Lovely write-up, thanks. I've recently been peeping through the shoulder-high Queen Anne's Lace into local fields in the early mornings, occasionally spotting deer and cursing myself for leaving my stalking ground back home when I moved up here and then not booking anything until the autumn. But then, I suppose that's what fishing is for!
 
Well done PM.

That Stutzen of yours is certain to be jealous and will no doubt show its contempt for your lack of affection at the next BSRC Range Day!

All the best

K
 
I love that stutzen. It just doesn't fit in a rucksack. Mostly I don't go stalking enough. Are you coming to the H4H day at the BSRC? I and the stutzen are.
 
"I love that stutzen. It just doesn't fit in a rucksack."

Get a guitar case? With stickers, very innocent. Better still get a truck!!!! :stir:

David.
 
Right, just for the sake of completing the tale:

IMAG2137 by pinemarten, on Flickr

Later on that evening, in my shed...


IMAG2138 by pinemarten, on Flickr

As you can see, the close range led to the loss of a shoulder and the need to cut off a chunk of ribcage. But the posh cuts were fine.

2017-05-18_07-41-13 by pinemarten, on Flickr

Didn't forget the fillets this year. Glad that YPM emptied his plate and asked "Papa, can I have more muntjac?". Result.


2017-05-20_07-55-27 by pinemarten, on Flickr

Next evening's dinner: a combination of terroirs.


2017-06-05_06-52-08 by pinemarten, on Flickr

And finally, the first batch of the birthday barbecue. Every last morsel eaten by the guests and a bunch of "townies" who leave with a positive view of stalking.
 
Not bad for a limp wristed liberal :D, out of interest you used sticks for a twenty metre shot with the superb balance of your drilling do think you could have managed a shot off hand? I love my double rifle and as a man that routinely used sticks or bipod for shooting I was surprised to find with a little practice I could hit stones and clay pigeons out to 100yds offhand with the scope (swarovoski EE). I also found that the heavy triggers also benefited my rifle shooting as well and the offhand shooting gave me great confidence when using a bolt action in a less than perfect position.
 
With practice I'm sure I could, I Just don't have the opportunity to practice so stick to what I know works in a stalking situation. I allow myself more experimentation at the range. And it really shows in terms of results when I start mucking about. But certainly, you shouldn't need sticks with that rifle at ten metres.... Could be because my wrists are so limp of course.
 
Last edited:
I think your drilling is the perfect close quarter deer medicine especially when you have a split seconds opportunity and haven't got time to faff about with sticks, I suppose in ealing the neighbors might get irate when you start taking pot shots at stones, sticks and any other opportune targets. I have to confess that other than in Cameroon I have never used my double in anger, one of my goals is to take a buck this summer.
 
When I put a proper new scope on it, it will be much more than a close quarter rifle. At the moment it's limited by being rubbish in low light. Put a modern scope on it and with the accuracy it's shown down tye range, even in my limpwristed hands, it's quite happily a 250m rifle.
 
Thanks for the write-up and congratulations a successful outing.
A low-power variable is a good choice for woodland stalking, especially in late spring and summer when ranges are often short. My drilling wears an old Kahles Helia 3-9x40 and even 3X can be too much.
For muntjac I usually take the .222/20g BBF, as for that I have the choice of a Sightron 1-7x24 (a good format but the scope is built much too big for the job it does, so I'm minded to replace it with a Zeiss Conquest V6 1.1-6x24) or a Docter sight, each on a QD mount. I carry both.
Typically, the scope comes off and the red dot goes on when I enter the wood as I've found that it is much better than the scope for acquiring a muntjac quickly at close range, even when the latter is wound right down.
I used to use the open sights, and took several animals (muntjac, fox and rabbits) with them, but am just that bit more consistent with the red dot.
 
Back
Top