Yes, however that would be similar for all groups, providing it isn't a gusty dayI don't really see the point of doing it at longer ranges. Surely the longer the bullet's in the air, the greater the inaccuracies introduced by wind etc.?
I was thinking of gusts, since there are plenty here, and even a very modest change of windspeed must account for quite a difference in group at even 100yds.Yes, however that would be similar for all groups, providing it isn't a gusty day
Check out Mark and sam afterwork, he explains how he does his load development, quite intriguingI was thinking of gusts, since there are plenty here, and even a very modest change of windspeed must account for quite a difference in group at even 100yds.
Thank you. Will do right now.Check out Mark and sam afterwork, he explains how he does his load development, quite intriguing
You will have to have a good going through lol, good luckThank you. Will do right now.
1000 for my hill rifles
Used this method for a 6.5 Cr, went through the range of loads at 100m and then took the 3 most promising out to 280yds as this was easily accommodated. I did this on a completely windless evening but also found it useful to confirm the 11 clicks of elevation on the BT suggested by the Swarovski database. The elevation was based on a MV suggests by Swiss Reload for my loading and worked out spot on.depends how you develop
100gr for OCW group proving
300+ for ladder