Heym SR20
Well-Known Member
I have three driven type scopes.
1) an old Nickel Supra 1-4x20 on straight 1" tube with 1" tube eyepiece. Its a really tough Reticle moving type scope with a German No 1 type reticle in the FFP. FOV on 1 is wide - but probably 20m wide at 100m. I was going to mount it on my Combination Gun,
but then looked at a more modern scope.
2) A Schmidt and Bender 1-4x20 - with a straight Post Reticle in the FFP. Its on 30mm tube - beautiful optics and a really nice scope. And I quite like the reticle and in view it just looks like a shot gun rib - put target on end and squeeze. If I could persuade S&B to switch it to a No4 or an illuminated (which on their website they say they can do, but in when enquired they say nein) I would do this. I had it mounted on my 7x57 for a while and it shoots well and used it for closer range woodland and it was excellent, then mounted it on the combination for driven piggies. It would be ideal for Plains / Big Game in Zimbabwean type bushveld.
3) I got tempted by a certain Emporium into a Docter Comfort 1-4x20 with just an illuminated dot reticle in the 2nd Focal Plane. I really like this and its mounted on my combination when its being used as a double rifle. At 1x this has a very wide 33m at 100m Field of view - You keep both eyes open and its wider than my own field of view - you don't even see the scope surrounds, but can see the rear and front sight. The latter is a red bead which was a bit off putting at first and should really cover with a piece of black tape.
With any of the above I would quite happily take on any deer sized animal out to acceptable ranges.
But I have tried the high zoom low power scopes from Docter, Swarovski etc. These are typically 1-6 or 1-8x20. They have large eyepieces and the image a top magnification has an element of distortion around the edge - its not like the crisp neat image you get with say a 6x42 or an 8x56 scope. I tried the Docter Version on targets to zero it in, and this distortion at 6x really put me off so swapped for the 1-4x20 version no distortion and substantially more compact and lighter. I did look long and hard at the little Leupold 1-4x20 on a 1" tube but only came in their plex reticle in the FFP.
I can understand how these would be useful on a battle rifle but suspect that a more useful route would be to have a 4-12 x42 or 50 as the main optic with a light weight Red dot up top for when up close and personal - which is what the Army has done for its L129A1 as a sniper support weapon.
1) an old Nickel Supra 1-4x20 on straight 1" tube with 1" tube eyepiece. Its a really tough Reticle moving type scope with a German No 1 type reticle in the FFP. FOV on 1 is wide - but probably 20m wide at 100m. I was going to mount it on my Combination Gun,
but then looked at a more modern scope.
2) A Schmidt and Bender 1-4x20 - with a straight Post Reticle in the FFP. Its on 30mm tube - beautiful optics and a really nice scope. And I quite like the reticle and in view it just looks like a shot gun rib - put target on end and squeeze. If I could persuade S&B to switch it to a No4 or an illuminated (which on their website they say they can do, but in when enquired they say nein) I would do this. I had it mounted on my 7x57 for a while and it shoots well and used it for closer range woodland and it was excellent, then mounted it on the combination for driven piggies. It would be ideal for Plains / Big Game in Zimbabwean type bushveld.
3) I got tempted by a certain Emporium into a Docter Comfort 1-4x20 with just an illuminated dot reticle in the 2nd Focal Plane. I really like this and its mounted on my combination when its being used as a double rifle. At 1x this has a very wide 33m at 100m Field of view - You keep both eyes open and its wider than my own field of view - you don't even see the scope surrounds, but can see the rear and front sight. The latter is a red bead which was a bit off putting at first and should really cover with a piece of black tape.
With any of the above I would quite happily take on any deer sized animal out to acceptable ranges.
But I have tried the high zoom low power scopes from Docter, Swarovski etc. These are typically 1-6 or 1-8x20. They have large eyepieces and the image a top magnification has an element of distortion around the edge - its not like the crisp neat image you get with say a 6x42 or an 8x56 scope. I tried the Docter Version on targets to zero it in, and this distortion at 6x really put me off so swapped for the 1-4x20 version no distortion and substantially more compact and lighter. I did look long and hard at the little Leupold 1-4x20 on a 1" tube but only came in their plex reticle in the FFP.
I can understand how these would be useful on a battle rifle but suspect that a more useful route would be to have a 4-12 x42 or 50 as the main optic with a light weight Red dot up top for when up close and personal - which is what the Army has done for its L129A1 as a sniper support weapon.
Last edited:

