it's down to your own personal choice most of the time but also what the foxes dictate and also your lamp power ie if you have lamp shy foxes a a 2 million candel power lamp then yeah your probely going to want a filter, i hate filters personaly but when i do have to use one i go to amber so as it doesnt cut out to much light for when your trying to identify the fox as a fox
Depends entirely how they respond. I don't break out the filters until they start showing shyness to the white/blue light, no need to educate them to all the tricks right away!
Depends how far you need to id them, red is only good for about 120 yards, orange and green are good for well over 200 yards. I like green and have it on a roof mount 240 and an amber on a scope mount 170. I have shot foxes to just over 250 yards using amber in late summer, ie no mist/fog.
we vary have amber and red however the best bit of kit you can get is a dimmer, makes all the difference if you use it with no filter. Spot the fox then dim it down till you can just make out the eyes while you try and call in, then increase the light for the shot
Depends entirely how they respond. I don't break out the filters until they start showing shyness to the white/blue light, no need to educate them to all the tricks right away!
I second that. On a "virgin" bit of ground I was able to use a lamp without any filter for at least 6 months for both fox and rabbit, I have got a Clulite CB2.
I now use an amber filter on that ground. I have used red filters on my mates Lightforce, but it did seem to reduce the range considerably.
As suggested by Jay 22, spotting with NV, getting within range then switching on lamp for the shot is a very effective way, as Guesty and I found out!!! Great bit of kit!!!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.