You have to be seriously deluded not to recognise that there is a problem with raptor persecution in the UK.
It is about time that the shooting community shopped the tiny minority involved in this and other illegal practices.
The current situation is analogous to 10000 people sitting in a boat in the middle of a shark infested ocean watching one idiot drilling a large hole in the bottom of it. Not only that, some are even denying that he is drilling the said hole at all.
Without any degree of delusion, the following applies:
1. There are very wide discrepancies between what antis claim and what the facts, so far as they can be established, are.
2. It is not unknown for antis to fabricate evidence. A recent example resulting in the anti concerned being convicted of it, and his sympathisers attacking the home of a police officer involved in the case. This means that it is not safe to uncritically accept the premise of the antis argument.
3. Yes, the shooting community must continue taking the strongest possible steps against this. However, it is never possible to completely stamp out a tiny minority of people committing a crime. There is almost no example of any crime where such an outcome has been achieved or even considered realistic.
4. Yes, killing raptors is criminal and a deeply-damaging own goal if and when it is carried out by keepers.
5. In this case, there is no definite evidence establishing that an eagle has been killed.
6. This story has a number of spurious aspects, and the narrative put forward by, inter alia, the RSPB is sheer lunacy.
If, on the other hand, one wishes to accept uncritically the claims being made by extremists, then that's deluded.