Comparing Terminal Performance of Non-lead/Copper Bullets on UK Deer

I have been very pleased with the performance of the Fox 130gn .308 ammunition that I have bought from Ed at Edinburgh Rifles.

Fair to say that I have noticed that the reaction to the shot with Red Hinds on the hill is different and all the roe that I have shot have dropped as if hit by lightning.

We are going to have to switch to non-toxic very soon & I have no problem with it.

Please feel free to contribute with a report and pictures :)
 
Yes. Prior to the internet, I think I would have agreed with you. However, nowadays, that medium does level the science playing field somewhat. Large, albeit messy, datasets can be generated by interest-groups such as ourselves if the will is there. I think well done, @caberslash for giving it a go.
Yes, agree with you.

Nice to get their data as well though as they will have had an overarching approach. Well hopefully.

The danger with informal studies is that not all data is captured, or is subjective across multiple respondents, so when you merge data sets you only end up with a smaller subset of common data at best or a collection of difficult to interpret cases at worst (common on the internet). It would be a shame to go to a lot of effort and miss meaningful insights. Hence the relative merits of large studies set up by a managing/cordinating body
 
Yes, agree with you.

Nice to get their data as well though as they will have had an overarching approach. Well hopefully.

The danger with informal studies is that not all data is captured, or is subjective across multiple respondents, so when you merge data sets you only end up with a smaller subset of common data at best or a collection of difficult to interpret cases at worst (common on the internet). It would be a shame to go to a lot of effort and miss meaningful insights. Hence the relative merits of large studies set up by a managing/cordinating body
Yes. I agree. I think, from a human perspective, stalkers are more likely to listen to the experiences of other stalkers than they are to most of the likely coordinators of any such research. The history of mala fides of many of the latter is such that they are easy for most of us (myself included) to dismiss out-of-hand as motivated by something other than scientific curiosity.
 
Copper bullets tend not to fragment like lead ones, so a shot passing through a roe half way up will stand more chance of missing the arteries and heart than one placed a little lower where it would pass through the upper heart . As for hitting the leg /shoulder bones, the slightly lower shot is further away from them. See attached links.
Clearly deer stance needs to be taken on board with the shot. - I guess more broken legs are caused by failure to account for that.

(Scroll photos in the ad to show roe anatomy picture)


Caberslash, my mentor was very much into keeping carcasses clean (he was a game dealer) and geting the most meat. Plus it takes much more work to clean a messily shot beast.
Also the days of my learning were before the time of much copper bullet usage in the UK. - I'm sure my mentor would approve of copper.

Back to the OP subject, last week my guest shot a roe buck with a TTSX 130 grain bullet at 3000ft/sec and close range. The bullet struck a bit high (it was a downhil/ quartering shot, smashing through the narrow /solid area of the shoulder. The petals broke off and a couple were found in the cavity having caused quite a mess and meat loss.
The main part of the bullet kept going straight as expected).
The bullet and fragments wrecked the arteries above the heart and missed the heart completely. As to be expected it was a bang-flop instantaneous kill.

Dodgyknees I wrote 20mm low ---- Not 2".

Ian
 
Last edited:
Back to the OP subject, last week my guest shot a roe buck with a TTSX 130 grain bullet at 3000ft/sec and close range. The bullet struck a bit high (it was a downhil/ quartering shot, smashing through the narrow /solid area of the shoulder. The petals broke off and a couple were found in the cavity having caused quite a mess and meat loss.
The main part of the bullet kept going straight as expected).
The bullet and fragments wrecked the arteries above the heart and missed the heart completely. As to be expected it was a bang-flop instantaneous kill.

Thanks for this Ian, presume it was a .270 Win or .308W?

I'd argue that adjusting shot placement into the hilar/high shoulder area, with the objective of achieving a bang-flop, at the expense of meat damage is a compromise we have to make, as we all know an unrecovered carcass is 100% meat loss.

If copper really has merit for the food chain then game dealers should also accept this.

There was a big hoo-haa regarding a consultation (you will know better than me which one it was) that gamedealers wanted head-shot deer, but syndicates/groups like Defence Deer Management were strongly against this (ironic given their profession).

I think we can all agree that with truly wild deer we will never be able to get perfect shot placement every time, and ultimately we should be aiming to kill our quarry as quickly and cleanly as possible, and if this means another round into it to compensate for a poor first shot, then so be it.
 
Exit woundIMG-20210621-WA0000.webp
IMG-20210621-WA0002.webp
IMG-20210621-WA0001.webp
20210621_105337.webp
Species: Roe

Sex: Male

Larder Weight (head, legs and internal organs removed): 13kg

Rifle Calibre/Chambering: .270 Winchester

Ammunition Type: Factory- Sako Powerhead II

Bullet manufacturer: Barnes

Bullet model: TTSX

Bullet weight: 110 grains

Muzzle Velocity (if known): 3,180 fps

Barrel Length: 20 inches

Barrel Twist rate (if known): 1-10"

Shot distance: 140 meters,ranged

Shot placement: High chest, Broadside

Distance travelled: 3 meters

Tracking dog required? No.

Spotted facing head on, deer turned to face broadside, slightly uphill, so the bullet was aimed for the high chest. Deer dropped to the shot and expired quickly. Bullet expanded well, hitting ribs on entry and exit, damage to internal organs was effective.
 
.25-06
Barnes 100gn ttsx 3350 ft/sec
Entry high shoulder
Exit as pic
Range 246 yards
Dropped on spot
Only 1 pic as I was getting eaten alive by midges
 

Attachments

  • 559FB117-FF47-42CE-89A1-86FF73243BFA.webp
    559FB117-FF47-42CE-89A1-86FF73243BFA.webp
    738.3 KB · Views: 79
.25-06
Barnes 100gn ttsx 3350 ft/sec
Entry high shoulder
Exit as pic
Range 246 yards
Dropped on spot
Only 1 pic as I was getting eaten alive by midges
No wonder the yearling dropped on the spot. But nice to see the expansion of that bullet at such a distance, potentially due to the shoulder/spine hit, would be interesting to see how the ttsx performs at similar distances in a heart/lung/rear lung hit as well
 
Just shot a hind and calf this morning with my .300 WSM with 150 TTSX (velocity 3342 FPS) the calf was broadside at 198m, the calf dropped to the shot, the hind ran another 40-50m then stopped and presented a quartering away shot at around 240-250m which was taken, she then ran around 5m uphill and collapsed. Shown are pictures of the gralloch and the inside of the carcass back at the larder. (These will be on two separate replies so as to be clear what corresponds to what)
 
Now the hind:

2B8FAEA4-F1B6-4B6C-860F-DDDC97D44D66.webp
CCA5E83A-14D7-4314-9376-3CC084154AD5.jpeg
As you can see from the second image it was a reasonably quartering shot, it has made a good job of the lungs and nicked the top of the heart.

Shot distance: 240-250m
Estimated Terminal velocity: 2696FPS
 
Last edited:
Attached pic is from a sika stag killed last week. .308 130g TTSX @3000fps. Bullet went into the low neck collapsing it on the spot, it was sat under the skin mid rib cage. I’ll be weighing it when I see a certain vet friend of mine 🤣. My guess is 125g. I killed 4 red stags and 1 sika stag and none went far, contributing to my general satisfaction with TTSX both in 6.5 and .308-provided certain parameters are met.FF077F7D-36AA-4B36-8977-513AFCF25D8C.webp
 
Back
Top