I dont have to justify my 'claims'
You do, if you wish to engage in a rational debate. Otherwise your false claims as to my motives and failure to respond are just plain unfounded insults.
I am entitled to my opinion of your responses,
Of course you are...but you are not entitled to project those opinions onto me and claim them as fact.
I have also pointed out continually, your tactic of distracting from the central premise of the thread
I answered the central premise of your demand regarding zeroed death rate in Japan immediately. Where is the distraction?
The OP (central premise?) of the thread was "How are the returnees going to be PCR tested?" which has not intruded into our exchange.
Most people would have just accepted my minor grammatical mistake and moved on, but you seem to have created a bit of an obsession here
I accepted your minor grammatical mistakes when you finally admitted them, and thanked you for the apology...but you have yet to acknowledge that my description of "aggressive demand" was justified as a result of them.
My analysis is that you have some kind of issue,
Based on what? Your crystal ball, which gives you insights into what other people believe and the right to post those as facts?
your obsessive pursuit here is making you look a little bit deranged.
Maybe, but I am not the one making spurious claims that I am not prepared to justify, nor am I the one accusing you of abusing insects and toads.
Lets face it , youve taken this off on a tangent , and it stopped being a debate when you accused me of demanding answers from you in an AGRESSIVE MANNER

Perhaps its your intention to get the thread locked ?
Or maybe it would be better for you to put me on ignore , then I wont be able to upset you further ?
Let's face it...you intervened and took my question to
@zambezi off on a tangent with a demand that I account for the zeroed death rate in Japan.
A demand which I answered immediately...
No idea, hence my asking a question about it.
You have subsequently continued to insult my integrity by attributing me with false premises and casting aspersions on my motives, and accuse me most recently of avoiding the central issue of the thread.
Justify your claims please.
Alan