Heym SR20
Well-Known Member
1) reduce calibre choice to military calibres thus benefitting large volume production of bullets, brass and powders. Thus 223, 308 and I suppose 6.5 Creedmoor.The hypothesis "Ridiculous rates for ammunition will end recreational shooting" has generated some debate.
Has any one any ideas on reducing the price we pay?
2) Within each calibre two choices of bullets. A solid military ball for use on ranges, targets, gongs etc. and a monolithic expanding bullet for use on vermin / small deer with 223, and larger deer the 6.5 and 308.
3) reloading powder limited to little one for 223, bigger one for 6.5 and 308.
In the UK the biggest cost is probably the range of calibres and then the range and number of different brands that we all want. This is hugely inefficient from a supply perspective with the trade having to invest large amounts in ammo that may or may not not move off the shelf.
But what would be the fun in that. No chance to debate the endless merits of the 6.5 CM over the 260 and 6.5x55, or that it is so much better than the 243, 7-08, 7x57, 7x64, 270 win or the 130 gn bullet is better than the 140 or 150, or the brand with blue, red, green, black or indeed pink box is so much better. Actually if you think about we expect each and every gunshop and the supply chain to have that range of options in stock.
Military ammo a long time ago standardised into one or two calibres that pretty much covered all requirements. This allows development and capital costs to be spread over millions of rounds, and simplified supply chains.
