It
from mine and others’observations, marksmanship is poor. Downgrading tests to ensure a higher pass rate was the ‘solution’.
Often seen as a box that needs ticking there is a totally **** approach, insufficient ammunition procured as too difficult to return unused to stores, other ‘concurrent activities’ while shooting goes on, the weaker shots given multiple chances to retake (but not train in advance) while those that pass first time are not permitted to also improve. Some pass irrespective of score.
If it was fitness training, an easily organised and measurable activity, and the same methodology was employed we would have 80% of the army injured or fat lardasses.
I blame it on two things in the main, the SASC who are useless at developing marksmanship standards and are a safety school (but without the grey matter to judge risk), and the reduction of range availability - Landmarc etc.
What doesnt help is the fundamental lack of pride in individual marksmanship standards vice section and platoon firepower and the realisation of what is required to achieve acceptable standards.
Truly shocking
I've heard a lot of reports along the same lines
I work with an outfit that teaches SERE to current troops - it can range from just a video to annual survival stuff
I don't get involved in the top end (Evasion and resistance to interrogation) for downed pilots, SF etc, but some of my colleagues do
Some of the lads and lasses that I see come through the training that I’m involved with remind me of the Dutch conscripts of the 80's !!