Dumping of shot pheasants

Stopped reading after " a video by anti bloodsports activists".

Until they stop trying to con and lie their way to drive their agenda nothing should be taken seriously from them.
 
Theres an FB group called - giving up the game - some of you may already use it.

I too am always disappointed in just how few people take birds after the shoot.....
 
That's right, just shove your head in the sand and hope everything will be OK.
I'll just leave that to your sorts.

Read enough from you to know your content isn't something to value so that's enough conversing and time wasting.
 
  • Love
Reactions: VSS
Ah yes. Someone posts a video showing some poor behaviour recorded by antis and half the people on here use it as a stick to beat and argue with each other. Pathetic in the extreme and massively counter-productive.

Give yourselves a shake. You might like some field sports and not others. But how is "dissing" field sports you don't like ever going to end well?
 
The way to shoot pheasants and partridge with any class is only shoot as many as you want to dress and eat .
in the head with an air rifle or 22 LR .
Otherwise it's purely killing for fun like fox hunting .
Thousands of birds get dumped every season .
Who wants pulverised rotting meat full of lead .

Or take more than you shot! On Saturday, I shared a gun on an end of season beaters day and connected with 3 pheasants. I took home 8 and the whole bag was divided up. I normally get fed up after plucking two so I will pluck two and skin the rest into breasts and legs for the freezer. Carcasses get roasted to make pheasant stock with random vegetables and herbs. It doesn't seem to matter to much if they still have some feathers on.

I appreciate you weren't looking for a reply, but I want to get a positive post into this thread!
 
Or take more than you shot! On Saturday, I shared a gun on an end of season beaters day and connected with 3 pheasants. I took home 8 and the whole bag was divided up. I normally get fed up after plucking two so I will pluck two and skin the rest into breasts and legs for the freezer. Carcasses get roasted to make pheasant stock with random vegetables and herbs. It doesn't seem to matter to much if they still have some feathers on.

I appreciate you weren't looking for a reply, but I want to get a positive post into this thread!
That is the way to do it sir . Hungry now 👍
 
The crux of the matter is that game is now a by-product of game shooting, to some extent it always has been, but current production levels have completely overwhelmed the market to the extent that prices have totally collapsed and you can’t even give it away.
As long as the demand for shooting outstrips the market for game its not going to change and deer are likely to be the next victims of this trend, I’m getting 50% of what I was 2 years ago.
We need to shoot less, develop a broader market for the product or just get used to leaving it on the ground.
No different to straw being a bi-product of growing wheat and barley TBH. The difference is that people don't travel around the country chucking money at local country estates, hotels and pubs to eat wheat.
Lets not forget that one of the reasons that venison prices are currently quite low is because the hospitality industry is working at well below pre-covid levels. That will hopefully change in the near future though.
 
Exactly this is what turned my mind against ever participating is ‘shoots’.
As a boy in Norfolk, I witnessed the local shoot bulldozing a large hole and filling it with shot pheasants after the shoot.
Made my blood boil even at that age.
Have never participated on a paid shoot to this day as the childhood memory is always in my mind.
I shoot what I will eat, no more (rats, squirrels and foxes excluded obviously).
 
I actually cant get my head around the fact that people cant eat what they shoot, I mean how could anyone justify it?

Look at it dispassionately.

The birds are being reared to be shot, not as a food source.

The shoots are there to provide birds to be shot, not to serve food.

The guns on driven shoots pay money to shoot birds, not to source food.

The justification for shooting is that guns are paying for the service being provided. If that service wasn't being provided, they would shoot elsewhere. If that service was no longer available at all, they would be playing golf or something similar.

Taking a brace of birds home at the end of the day is purely coincidental.
 
Look at it dispassionately.

The birds are being reared to be shot, not as a food source.

The shoots are there to provide birds to be shot, not to serve food.

The guns on driven shoots pay money to shoot birds, not to source food.

The justification for shooting is that guns are paying for the service being provided. If that service wasn't being provided, they would shoot elsewhere. If that service was no longer available at all, they would be playing golf or something similar.

Taking a brace of birds home at the end of the day is purely coincidental.
Kind of like breeding pigeons and trap shooting them then?

We know what happened to that pastime don’t we
 
I actually cant get my head around the fact that people cant eat what they shoot, I mean how could anyone justify it?
There are loads of animals and birds shot all over the world that are not eaten. Why is that so difficult to understand? Not sure what foxes, rats or magpies taste like but I just don't fancy them.
 
Look at it dispassionately.

The birds are being reared to be shot, not as a food source.

The shoots are there to provide birds to be shot, not to serve food.

The guns on driven shoots pay money to shoot birds, not to source food.

The justification for shooting is that guns are paying for the service being provided. If that service wasn't being provided, they would shoot elsewhere. If that service was no longer available at all, they would be playing golf or something similar.

Taking a brace of birds home at the end of the day is purely coincidental.
So birds are killed for...........peoples amusement sport joy money etc insert any description you like, but if I was to look at it dispassionately , it would be killing for killings sake, but I don't want to judge others, nor would I want to provide the anti's with a gilt edged opportunity, it just sits very uneasilywith me. As I child I was taught to eat what you shoot, & yes I have eaten some very interesting dishes, Skylark, Swallow, Moorhen, Lapwings & frogs, plus a few more that I don't want to mention. And shame on me. I am older & wiser. :doh:
 
& I witnessed a whale being killed, by 7 men in a rowing boat, the sea turned red, & I ate some of that too, it was delicious, but never ever ever again.
 
Or perhaps like catching stocked trout in stillwaters, or repeatedly catching large carp - the enjoyment obtained is deemed sufficient to outweigh any potential "cruelty" involved?
Yes, it's apparently perfectly acceptable to traumatise and wound a fish, ugly buggers...
 
Back
Top