Malxwal
Well-Known Member
There's a fair amount of bitterness in Eberdoom towards the industry, very short sighted...
Climate Change Act
- Thread starter Wapinschaw
- Start date
Signed. The point is that atmospheric carbon [man-made or otherwise] is not the sole factor in climate variation. But it IS the sole focus of legislation which is bonkers.
Prof Happer and a raft of other highly qualified scientists have debunked NetZero as a hoax. Legislation built on that hoax must go.
Prof Happer and a raft of other highly qualified scientists have debunked NetZero as a hoax. Legislation built on that hoax must go.
Sunrise Stalker
Well-Known Member
Interesting doc giving an alternative narrative to the 'climate crisis'....
I will not be signing. If you think about the weather patterns we are currently experiencing it is obvious that something is going on with our climate. It is not ours to do with as we please, we hold it in trust for those who come after us. The laws may not be perfect, but it is somewhere to start.
Freeforester
Well-Known Member
I’m tellin’ ye - get them peasants to stump up more groats sharpish, cos I’m gettin’ bleddy wet here….
For the hard of thinking or time-poor - go to 7.57 and watch for five minutes if you can, three if you cannot:
The lesson: skip to 59:50 and try your best to hang on until 1:06:58.
Last edited:
It is social engineering wrapped up in pseudoscientific mumbo jumbo
Not that there isn't a real issue
Oil is coming to an end and the consequences are going to be catastrophic to an over-populated planet with expectations that exceed its talent and effort
Few people are net contributors in the West
Most take more than they put in
Most have expectations that a post oil world can't deliver
We have enjoyed 150 years of growth on the back of (essentially) free energy - oil and coal
Curious how there is a strong correlation between socialism and a desire to ''save the planet''
What is it they truly want?
Save the planet ?
Not possible - certainly not with this net zero bollocks
Collectivist control?
Altogether too possible - but not, in my opinion, desirable
I personally have grown tired of having to pretend a that a turd is a diamond in order to keep politicians, the media and left wing happy
Not that there isn't a real issue
Oil is coming to an end and the consequences are going to be catastrophic to an over-populated planet with expectations that exceed its talent and effort
Few people are net contributors in the West
Most take more than they put in
Most have expectations that a post oil world can't deliver
We have enjoyed 150 years of growth on the back of (essentially) free energy - oil and coal
Curious how there is a strong correlation between socialism and a desire to ''save the planet''
What is it they truly want?
Save the planet ?
Not possible - certainly not with this net zero bollocks
Collectivist control?
Altogether too possible - but not, in my opinion, desirable
I personally have grown tired of having to pretend a that a turd is a diamond in order to keep politicians, the media and left wing happy
Last edited:
What I've learned, to my great cost, over the years
When a simple solution to complex problem is offered, it is usually a con
If you are not sure who is the target of the con - it is usually you
I learned this the hard way !!
j
When a simple solution to complex problem is offered, it is usually a con
If you are not sure who is the target of the con - it is usually you
I learned this the hard way !!
j
Freeforester
Well-Known Member
Suggested reading:
And for BavBrit:
(See too, the recent senate bill S4488 (apropos existential threats to the population of USA) and:
Apropos the latter, see video by MarkoPL100, all of four minutes of time duration appx.
If someone were to suggest to you that the Sun has in the past and shortly will once again rise in the West and set in the East, you’d probably think them somewhat unhinged; and yet, the evidence that this has happened many times is all around us all over the planet. There is, however no such evidence to be found that demonstrates that carbon dioxide drives climate change any more than it is the cart which pushes the horse along a level road. It also appears that these days Alan Clarke’s ‘Civilisation’, Horizon and the content of BBC4 has been largely supplanted by the likes of Love Island and Strictly…
And for BavBrit:
(See too, the recent senate bill S4488 (apropos existential threats to the population of USA) and:
Apropos the latter, see video by MarkoPL100, all of four minutes of time duration appx.If someone were to suggest to you that the Sun has in the past and shortly will once again rise in the West and set in the East, you’d probably think them somewhat unhinged; and yet, the evidence that this has happened many times is all around us all over the planet. There is, however no such evidence to be found that demonstrates that carbon dioxide drives climate change any more than it is the cart which pushes the horse along a level road. It also appears that these days Alan Clarke’s ‘Civilisation’, Horizon and the content of BBC4 has been largely supplanted by the likes of Love Island and Strictly…
Last edited:
Freeforester
Well-Known Member
Didn't Al Gore become the first carbon credit billionaire? Like someone said, 'too much money in it to vote it down'.
Freeforester
Well-Known Member
I’d far rather we invaded Brazil and took over the management/protection of the still fast-disappearing Rain Forest.
K
K
John Gryphon
Well-Known Member
correct....too many chooks in the pen leads to feather picking and death
yes thats a given and whether it steps in with any or all of disease/floods/earthquakes/pestilence/droughts/wars it will come.
they want to save themselves only and dont give a tinkers about any others
We would not be successful at invading Brazil……Or protecting a rainforest.
John Gryphon
Well-Known Member
YWhy not? You lot kept the Malvina`s though.
Because recent history has proved that “those people in charge” can’t even run our own country successfully.
Well, the Falklands have been inhabited by British citizens since about 1760 and Argentina didn't even exist until mid 1800s perhaps the Brits have the better claim
If not, then perhaps the Aussies better get rowing and give Aus back to the original inhabitants
The yanks return from whence they came
Perhaps we had all better return to central africa?
Or better yet - the ocean?
If not, then perhaps the Aussies better get rowing and give Aus back to the original inhabitants
The yanks return from whence they came
Perhaps we had all better return to central africa?
Or better yet - the ocean?
Similar threads
