wildfowler.250
Well-Known Member
Folks I’ve been humming over a new rifle for a while now and I’ve been toying between a 6.5 and a .30 cal,(mainly an 06).
The more I look into it, there seems to be a lot of plus points for a high BC bullet.
The 6.5’s recoil less. Even if we tolerate recoil well, in theory, there is increased gun movement and higher recoil is harder to shoot as accurately.
But the .30 cals,(mainly the 06) can be used for almost anything bar dangerous game.
The Americans seem to really rate the 7mm’s at the moment as a happy medium between recoil and down range efficacy.
I was listening to an interesting gunwerks podcast recently and they were chatting about moving away from a ‘bigger hole is better’ and more towards high BC bullets minimising effects of wind and drop, so easier to hit the target.
Now I appreciate most of our deer are probably shot at around 150 yards so this becomes academic.. but is a 6.5 creedmore the boring, sensible, cover most boxes caliber these days? Or is the .30-06 still the one rifle to fill a cabinet that covers everything?
The more I look into it, there seems to be a lot of plus points for a high BC bullet.
The 6.5’s recoil less. Even if we tolerate recoil well, in theory, there is increased gun movement and higher recoil is harder to shoot as accurately.
But the .30 cals,(mainly the 06) can be used for almost anything bar dangerous game.
The Americans seem to really rate the 7mm’s at the moment as a happy medium between recoil and down range efficacy.
I was listening to an interesting gunwerks podcast recently and they were chatting about moving away from a ‘bigger hole is better’ and more towards high BC bullets minimising effects of wind and drop, so easier to hit the target.
Now I appreciate most of our deer are probably shot at around 150 yards so this becomes academic.. but is a 6.5 creedmore the boring, sensible, cover most boxes caliber these days? Or is the .30-06 still the one rifle to fill a cabinet that covers everything?