nf-fuse
Well-Known Member
The wording is 'if necessary'.None, but that's not the point. They've now made it a requirement to follow best practice and best practice is to have access to a deer dog
The wording is 'if necessary'.None, but that's not the point. They've now made it a requirement to follow best practice and best practice is to have access to a deer dog
If you can't find the derr... Is it necessary?The wording is 'if necessary'.
so how do you keep your dog keen and working if you don't take it?None, but that's not the point. They've now made it a requirement to follow best practice and best practice is to have access to a deer dog
I questioned this on the course and suggested a multispectral isn't a "dedicated" thermal and you could therefore be legal with lesser spec.640x512 , 50mm thermal,
so how do you keep your deer dog keen and working if you don't take it?I questioned this on the course and suggested a multispectral isn't a "dedicated" thermal and you could therefore be legal with lesser spec.
Raised eyebrows![]()
Yes, however what will you when following your own "best practice" plan when you go out? As that will be a waste of dog tracking services if you know you could avoid it. It is along side going stalking with out the bolt lol.I don't know, I have a useless retriever that just sits and watches me eat
View attachment 465259
I'm just stating that the guidance is now a requirement
I think having the number of a local service, or another stalker locally that has a dog, will sufficeYes, however what will you when following your own "best practice" plan when you go out? As that will be a waste of dog tracking services if you know you could avoid it. It is along side going stalking with out the bolt lol.
dont disagree with them theyll take those bits of paper off youI questioned this on the course and suggested a multispectral isn't a "dedicated" thermal and you could therefore be legal with lesser spec.
Raised eyebrows![]()
Then it is just ticking boxes...I think having the number of a local service, or another stalker locally that has a dog, will suffice
As is most legislation. Tick the box to show we are in no way liable for anything going wrongThen it is just ticking boxes...![]()
If you read the best practice it states:so how do you keep your dog keen and working if you don't take it?
My dog never came talking with me ever because she wasn’t stalking dog. She was a tracking dog. That’s what she was bred to do. That’s what she was trained to do.
I got all of that and quite aware about guide lines also could see the chap who I was asking fitted in for that course, all these "guide lines and best practice " sticks out like a sore thumb lolIf you read the best practice it states:
“As with daytime stalking a suitable dog should be available if necessary.”
So there is no difference if you stalk in the day or night according to best practice.
It is only access so having a mate with a hound to look the next morning is OK.
Remember these are guidelines not laws!
Also the BDS own the DI so they will of course push this.
And finally DO NOT TRUST THE DI!!!

This feels dangerously like one of those checklists at work that no one really follows to the letter but come in very handy if you want to fire someoneTo be honest I think with cl55 the number of people who are going to jump through all the hoops and go out with their buddy and 640x512 , 50mm thermal, risk assessment, informing the neighbours and forming an action planare actually really small. It's just basically public sector nonsense. Probably took a lot of meetings to cook up.
Unless shooting under CL55, in which case they now areRemember these are guidelines not laws!
No they are recommendations not lawUnless shooting under CL55, in which case they now are
CL55 literally states you must follow best practice guidance as part of it's conditions. If you don't, you are in breach of the night license, which is to say you are shooting without one.No they are recommendations not law