357/38 special underlever

Psyxologos

Well-Known Member
Hi all. I am planning on expanding on my caliber collection by adding a 357/38 special underlever. Do you have any suggestions as to makes, models and things to be aware of? I will be buying new. Many thanks.
 
Marlin Cowboy Limited with 24" octagon barrel.
You will struggle to get a Marlin,but will get a Remlin easily.
Good luck.
 
I like my Uberti "Winchester" 1873...shoots really well. Just don't expect it to like full pressure 357 Magnum all of the time as the action isn't the strongest.

I load either Trail Boss or Vectan Ba10 with 158grain Truncated Cones.
 
I like my Uberti "Winchester" 1873...shoots really well. Just don't expect it to like full pressure 357 Magnum all of the time as the action isn't the strongest.

I load either Trail Boss or Vectan Ba10 with 158grain Truncated Cones.

Is that particular to the Uberti or for the caliber in general?
 
Marlin Cowboy Limited with 24" octagon barrel.
You will struggle to get a Marlin,but will get a Remlin easily.
Good luck.

If you decide to go 2nd hand I have one of these original Marlins, made by Marlin that I am thinking of selling in the near future, drop me a PM if interested, they are a good investment as the original Marlins are very sought after and my club owner keeps telling me to keep hold of it but i just don't use it and would rather put the money to something I would use.

They are great guns, very well made, I think mine holds 13 rds of 38 special or around 10 357 mags, the action has been blue printed so super slick, you won't go wrong with the Marlins as they are side ejecting compared to some other makes
 
Does the choice depend on what it's wanted for, I wonder?

I have the Marlin-made Marlin 1894 SC which my father bought after they took the pistols away, and it is .357/.38, because that's what one of the pistols was.

At the club where I shoot it the competitions are out to 100yds, and overwhelmingly folk use .44 or .45 of various kinds - so if I'd bought it deliberately for that, I'd probably have gone for the large bore.

Having said that, .357 shoots well enough and is cheaper to run!
 
Is that particular to the Uberti or for the caliber in general?

As I understand it more the 1873 action.

1892 or 1894 is stronger action (looking at it an 1892 looks difficult to scope rather than the 94)

Thinking about one myself
 
Is that particular to the Uberti or for the caliber in general?

Action design: works fine with the more run of the mill cartridges but wasn't design for "rifle pressures" out of the 357 Magnum factory load.
The lock is just a toggle link and, unlike a Maxim gun, isn't that beefy. It will take the load BUT not advised (use Google and check out the American Cowboy blogs).
I really like my Carbine and a friend has a really nice rifle length version.
 
The 1892 Winchester is like an 1886 ( .45-70) scaled down for revolver cartridges, an update of the marketing genius of making the 1873 Winchester and the 1873 Colt in the same cartridges. The 1892 is strong, because of the dual locking lugs ( actually falling blocks, like the 1885 single shot ). But it was designed as a handy saddle gun or to fit into a buckboard or stage coach, to carry on a train and put in the overhead luggage rack. Scopes were not even considered.

And do you need a scope for a 100 yard rifle that shoots maybe 2 MOA? Heck, no. All you need is some practice with it.
 
The 1892 Winchester is like an 1886 ( .45-70) scaled down for revolver cartridges, an update of the marketing genius of making the 1873 Winchester and the 1873 Colt in the same cartridges. The 1892 is strong, because of the dual locking lugs ( actually falling blocks, like the 1885 single shot ). But it was designed as a handy saddle gun or to fit into a buckboard or stage coach, to carry on a train and put in the overhead luggage rack. Scopes were not even considered.

And do you need a scope for a 100 yard rifle that shoots maybe 2 MOA? Heck, no. All you need is some practice with it.

Southern, is more for low light as a cross hair or a little dot loses less resolution as light fades.

And my eye sight is not wonderful.

Scrummy
 
If you want to scope, the Marlin is best. Use the Warne bases as they are low enough to still use the open sights or receiver sight, if you put the scope in QD Warne or Weaver rings.

Bushnell makes some straight 30mm tube illuminated 1-4x24 and 1.5-6x24 scopes with a #4A reticle. I am playing with one now. Someone on the thread about Boar Scopes said Nikko Stirling makes one, too.
 
As I understand it more the 1873 action.

1892 or 1894 is stronger action (looking at it an 1892 looks difficult to scope rather than the 94)

Thinking about one myself

Thanks. So how do I find out which model uses what action? Is it part of the branding? I have no experience with the caliber, apologies if this sounds like a daft question...
 
go for one of the original marlins if u can find one much stronger actios side eject so easy to put a scope on if u wish and easy to strip for cleaning just need to remove one screw to dismantle the action they are always in demand so hold there price well unlike others but once u have one u will never want to sell it hence why u dont see many for sale
 
If you decide to go 2nd hand I have one of these original Marlins, made by Marlin that I am thinking of selling in the near future, drop me a PM if interested, they are a good investment as the original Marlins are very sought after and my club owner keeps telling me to keep hold of it but i just don't use it and would rather put the money to something I would use.

They are great guns, very well made, I think mine holds 13 rds of 38 special or around 10 357 mags, the action has been blue printed so super slick, you won't go wrong with the Marlins as they are side ejecting compared to some other makes

I had , another sale I regret , the same model . It was a JM stamped 1894 , a very handy and reliable " walking around" rifle . I will buy another , but in 44 RM . It's just a bit more practical in these parts . They really are a very nice little package and are easily scoped if that is something that might be of interest to you .

AB
 
Thanks. So how do I find out which model uses what action? Is it part of the branding? I have no experience with the caliber, apologies if this sounds like a daft question...

Usually in the name:

Marlin is called the 1894 (Though is modified to side eject from the original top eject JM Browning Design)
Winchester make 94s and 92s. (Winchester 94s come in an "AE" (Angle Eject) version that is easier to scope)
Chiappa do a 92

92s are relatively easy to spot due to the twin rising locking lugs: http://media.liveauctiongroup.net/i/10246/11003731_2.jpg?v=8CE2730C2935E90

Win 94s look something like this: http://www.kirkemmerich.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/guns-for-web-pgs-061.jpg

And Marlin 94s (with side eject): http://cdn2.armslist.com/sites/arms...817_01_marlin_1894c_357mag_lever_gun__640.jpg

Or that's at least how I understand it.

Scrummy
 
Back
Top