Orion
Well-Known Member
I partly agree, for sure. The Police currently need to 'have regard to' the Guide - which I think was seen (for reasons entirely beyond my comprehension) as a Good Thing by many shooting folk, but not quite such a Good Thing as giving the Guide the authority of statute, as this would remove 'regional variations', which are seen almost obsessively by some (again, for reasons I simply cannot grasp) as very nearly the Worst Thing Ever.
Although S55A currently is not brilliant, a change to give the HO Guide the force of statute clearly would be a complete disaster: since the Police and the HO would then have, as you say, carte blanche to make up whatever they want and, by waving this magic wand over it, turn it into actual Law.
But does S55A apply retrospectively to the 2016 HOG or is it referring to any subsequent Guidance that the HO issue? I get the impression that many CCs are looking to work to the impending 'statutory guidance' regarding medical evidence - because it contains the revisions that they (FELWG) want in place - while still steadfastly refusing to abide by the parts of the 2016 HOG they don't like because it's 'just guidance'.
Whichever it is I totally agree with Carl's post above:
"Political lobbying is all well and good, but to get our attention, you need to give some people a bloody nose first. Pick a Chief Constable, point your lawyers at him, and start thumping. Heck, we'll all chip in money to help you if you need it. That's the only way you will gain our trust."
BASC need to focus on a single CC who is deviating from HOG and put him/her on notice that the shooting community will not roll over indefinitely.