I've been following this story for a while. I don't have a problem with a non breeding animal being selected if the funds raised genuinely do help try to protect the long term survival of the species.
I'd prefer to see the animal rights nutters dig deep into their own pockets, buy out these permits and then pay for their end of life care so that everyone has the chance to go and see them rather than a hunter shooting one. But I live in the real world, hunting revenues do pay for animal conservation.
Incidentally this is nothing new. Namibia have been issueing permits for black rhino since 2012. The only reason the media appear to have taken an interest is because this is the first auction to take place outside Namibia, and the cost realised has broken the previous record, though it fell well short of some estimates. I guess the uber wealthy yanks bidding on this hunt at the SCI Dallas auction make it a worthwhile news story.
This is what really ****es me off though :-
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-25781746
Sadly we can't hunt the Asians peddling products made from rhino horn, they're the real threat to phino populations these days.
Maybe the SD forum could consider raising funds for a suitable wildlife conservation project at some point in the future. I'd happily contribute to a worthwhile cause with no need to pull the trigger on anything.