'Captive' deer.

captdavid

Well-Known Member
I have been told that hunting on game ranches in Texas is hunting captive deer. And our hunting it's not the same as British stalking.

The latter is definitely true. Our hunting iv very similar to doe box, high seat or tower box hunting. I would like to know if anyone has stalked west Texas deer, and their experiences. I suspect that our deer are much more afraid of humans, because they live in wilder locations, where all humans are seen as danger. I would guess that upon seeing a human on foot, ours will run, close to a mile before stopping. From what I read deer live in such proximity to humans, and public 'paths' leading from village to village, are traveled regularly through deer habitat. Small farms with fields crisscrossed with hedgerows would also help in stalking. Our ranch land is sparsely populated, sometimes with tens of miles between homes. and almost no row crops. Its hilly, rugged limestone rocky, with semi-open areas and dense juniper brush valleys and hill sides. In south Texas its thick brush country with rolling hills.

I suppose it depends on one's definition of captive and how it pertains to the ability to find and take game. My intent was more on ethical shooting. In Texas, most land is private or corporate owned. The state sets limits on 'native' species. The state sets the rules, but if it's on your land, it belongs to you. 'Exotics' i.e., sika, fallow, Axis, Reds, etc. are owned by the landowner, even if they just escaped from a neighbor. Most Hunting land in the western part of the state is in larger particles and ranched, not farmed for crops. These ranches can be hundreds of thousands of acres. of course most are smaller. Most of those are 'under low fence,(free roaming) barbed or sheep /goat wire. Some is under 'high fence.' This is 8' game proof fencing. obviously these ranches can be large or small. In my opinion, to be fair, animals hunted on small 2,3,4,5, hundred acre ranches, are not my cup of tea. Depending on geography and cover, once one gets bigger than a thousand acres, while technically captive, it doesn't make them any easier to hunt.
My hunting is divided between low fence and high fence. On the low fenced ranches there are feral hogs, native deer and a few exotics. on the high fenced ranches there can be a mix of exotics and natives. Although I have hunted smaller the ranch I have hunted for the last five years is 4600 acres. I can hunt Elk, Axis, Fallow, Sika, Black Buck and Scimitar Horned Antelope. There are also native whitetails and hogs. The cost for an animal is the same as on low fence hunting. another ranch that has red deer is 3600 acres. Due to a friend of a friend, I have a chance to hunt a management 4-5 year old red stag 8pt. It's priced right. It's on a 1600acre ranch. All of these ranches have thick cover, valleys and hills. Were it not for Game Ranches, lots of hunting opportunities would be lost.

Its important to remember these are truly wild animals and afraid of humans and most vehicles.

We have a saying: 'you play the hand you draw!' In some ways as a meat hunter, I wish we could hunt something, at low cost, or free year round.As I see it, as your game is free roaming, you have little ability to control over or under hunting. It's obvious, looking through the 'Articles' thread that many small bucks are killed, before they have time to mature to their potential. Again, this doesn't bother me, in fact in some ways it allows me to 'shoot horns.' Most deer leases here are sold by pricing the number of deer taken. For example let's compare two 1200 acre ranches, for lease. The one under high fence will probably lease for twice as much as the low fence one. this will have a cabin or mobile and entitle the taking of one trophy and maybe one inferior buck for8-10 hunters. an Exotic may be exchanged for a trophy if available. a couple of does will also be available for each hunter. Guests, with the exception of close family are not allowed. I haven't priced these lately, but I would guess these would be in the range of $4-$5000. The same lease on a low fence lease, would be about half that, with a slim chance for a true trophy. Smaller leases are available. I've seen some 100 acre leases go for $2000 per gun for five hunters. These are usually next to much larger leases, and the general rule is you see, you shoot, or if it's brown, it's down.
Ive explained fee for game hunting else where, but I usually hunt on the larger high fenced ranches for exotic does. The best deal for me is to go semi guided. they drop you off in a blind and pick you up. I shop around and can usually find a guaranteed doe and a really good chance for a pig or two for $5-$600 for a two day hunt. A pig only hunt is about half that. pig hunts are a little cheaper on low fenced ranches, for a little less.
given these options, what would you do, on a tight budget. capt david.
 
Hey Captdavid,

You're a stirring bu&&er! OK, my two cents' worth.

First, a couple of caveats about hunters judging other hunters.

1. I agree with you that we should all play the hand that we are dealt, in fact I'm sure Kenny Rogers wrote a song along those lines, eh?

2. I think local context is very important: what is appropriate, necessary or customary in one context might well be unpalatable in another.

3. Just because I don't like doing something, that doesn't mean I think it should be banned, particularly in the hunting world where we need to stick together and take a 'broad church' view of our particular and increasingly unloved community.

So, to the pursuit of 'captive game' (I hope you don't mind if I broaden your question slightly from 'deer' to 'game'?

I personally don't like to shoot any fenced game. It doesn't suit my hunting heritage. However, I do believe that the practice has a place in a blended and diverse approach to hunting and shooting. Let's take Africa for instance. I co-own and run a one-million-acre, wild, unfenced hunting concession in Mozambique. I do not advertise for business in the UK (or on here) because very few UK hunters have the funds or the inclination to hunt wild Africa. They hunt fenced game in South Africa or Namibia because it is cheaper, safer and more convenient...and the catering is better too! The South African farms are often large, they are intelligently and discretely fenced, and they provide a density and diversity of bought-in and home-bred game (including exotic colour variations) that it would be impossible to replicate in a wild context.

Although it is not my own preferred type of hunting, I don't think it is a bad thing; it is a good thing. In conservation terms, those South African farms have saved the rhino (although it has had a few setbacks over the past couple of years), they have increased lion populations by growing the demand for the shooting of captive-bred lions (a bit less popular nowadays), and they have ensured that South Africa now contains more game than ever before in its history. Further, their pricing model allows ordinary hunters to save up and get a taste of Africa. One or two of the many hundreds of hunters who visit that country will decide that they want to spread their wings yet further. They will save up and scrimp and save and go out and hunt in wild, unfenced Africa.

SA, Namibia and their fenced areas are incredibly helpful 'gateway drugs' that ensure a small but steady supply of addicts will continue to make their way towards the heroin that we provide in the rest of the world's most beautiful continent.

I guess, however, we then come to the question of how large must the paddock be before we can call it hunting? We'd probably all agree that if I tie a donkey to a tree then slot it with a .308, I haven't exactly 'hunted' it. A very reputable outfitter recently advertised on here for the opportunity to shoot wild boar in a fenced seven-acre wood. He didn't describe it as hunting and I think most of those people taking up the offer knew they were just buying meat with a bit of target practice attached. So, we move up to a couple of hundred acres which you personally feel uncomfortable with because it is too small to feel like hunting. Is it a few thousand acres? What about an island? What if I go and shoot muntjac on the Isle of Lundy? The place is tiny! God, I don't know.

I guess we all make a set of rules for ourselves in hunting and try to do our best. Those rules will be informed by context and by compromise. Some of my own, just to provoke some debate are: no fences, however large the area; no snares; no leg-hold traps; no drowning traps; no head-shooting; no driven pheasant; no running game unless wounded; treat vermin with the same respect as game; and a hundred others... tolerant fella, or what...?

Kind regards,

Carl
 
In the past it was named "canned hunting" Canned hunt - Wikipedia cant see much in common with the way we hunt in the uk, but as the saying goes,,, "not my monkeys,, not my circus"

that said, with hunting so often in the news in such a negative way, I don't think this sort of thing helps make a logical case for shooting in general.
 
Last edited:
Although the size of the fenced area does play a part I think the fear of humans and terrain are more important. I have permission on a small area with no fence but I know pretty much that every eve deer will come out if the woods to feed on crops so its a case of simply sitting in a high seat and ambushing deer at 100m. These are wild deer that can go wherever they please but I'd not really call it stalking, it's about meat harvesting and crop protection. On the flip side I was asked to shoot a couple of fallow that were trapped inside a 100 acre site on the Ashdown forest that was made up of long grass, gorse bushes and some small wooded areas. After a number of visits using thermal, standing on a tower with 360° vision and many stalks I never once saw a deer there even though there was plenty of sign to indicate they were still within the site. There were just too many places for them to hide and they were very wary of people.

The idea of a fenced hunt can be very different to the actual practice depending on a number of factors, saying that I prefer the idea of a truly wild hunt on public land where the chance of success feels more random.
 
Fences are a way of life in most managed lands. Whether this is simple stock fences, or much higher deer type fences, they are a fact of life. I am a member of syndicate where we have 5,000 ha of planted forestry - and is surrounded by a perimeter deer fence and internally are several fences for various blocks. Some are in good condition, others are broken and others have gates open.

The deer are truly wild, you can spend days in the middle not going anywhere near a fence and they are truly challenging to stalk. Its not the same as open hill stalking, but my annual cost is the same as one day at stag on most estates.
 
Out of curiosity, if I wanted to spend two days hunting a approximately, generally, how much would it cost including purchase of the meat. for a sika hind, hunt/stalk a silver medal sika stag, a red hind and a silver medal stag? I am not physically able to do much stalking, so it would have to be high seats doe boxes etc. I had hoped to return to Great Britian, but for physical and financial reasons am unable to. This just for my general knowledge.

Because we have these high fenced lands, we have lots of opportunities to hunt game, e otherwise would not. Some animals do escape and eventually will probably establish. Axis are at that point now. I was hunting on a low fence ranch for hogs. If I saw an axis or red doe or spike/4pt the fee would be an additional amount. I didn't see either. This ranch is adjacent to a state park that has limited draw hunts. The chances of killing an exotic is 18%, being drawn is 11%.

My personal feelings, are that I want a high fenced ranch to be rugged and at least 800-1000 acres or better. The smallest that I will hunt this year, for a management red stag, a 4-5yr old 8-9pt is 1600 acres. Hunting is hunting, but landowner says to plan a two day hunt and possibly more. capt david
 
Back
Top