Case Head Separation Signs?

I'm sure so - a video simulation would be interesting!

And another thing!

Even if the case did not get pushed back to the bolt face immediately through reaction to the bullet mass, it would as soon as the pressure peaked when the bullet ogive hit the lands a few thou forward but was still mainly contained within the neck.

Alan
 
And another thing!

Even if the case did not get pushed back to the bolt face immediately through reaction to the bullet mass, it would as soon as the pressure peaked when the bullet ogive hit the lands a few thou forward but was still mainly contained within the neck.

Alan
I don't dispute that the case-head ends up snug against the bolt-face not long after 'ignition'. The question seems to me to be whether the rest of the case is already anchored by expansion of the brass onto the chamber wall when it does so.
In the world of my imagination, as the pressure rises markedly the thinner parts of the case grip the chamber walls first, and as it goes on rising more and more case grips the wall until you get to the bit just above the web (usually) at which point the pressure required to push the case out to the extent it grips is higher than that needed to stretch the brass along the length of the case - and so the case-head meets the bolt-face and stretches the case in the familiar place.
 
I don't dispute that the case-head ends up snug against the bolt-face not long after 'ignition'. The question seems to me to be whether the rest of the case is already anchored by expansion of the brass onto the chamber wall when it does so.
In the world of my imagination, as the pressure rises markedly the thinner parts of the case grip the chamber walls first, and as it goes on rising more and more case grips the wall until you get to the bit just above the web (usually) at which point the pressure required to push the case out to the extent it grips is higher than that needed to stretch the brass along the length of the case - and so the case-head meets the bolt-face and stretches the case in the familiar place.
In my imagination, the case moves back to bolt face first, and the stretch / reform movement of the shoulder and neck take place afterwards.

This because the neck cannot expand until the bullet leaves and allows the internal surface of the neck to be exposed to the pressure.

But as I said above, the bullet ogive would have hit the lands and the pressure would have pushed the case back to the bolt face....being the line of least resistance...before the bullet has moved out of the case neck.

It is only as the bullet leaves that it progressively exposes the internal surface of the neck to the pressure allowing it to radially expand and grip the chamber wall.

Alan
 
Last edited:
I tried the paper clip test, couldn‘t feel anything untoward but I’ve decided to bin them anyway and load some once fired cases.

Use a hacksaw or a Dremel to cut one of them in half lengthways & post up a photo of the result.

Ta.
 
In my imagination, the case moves back to bolt face first, and the stretch / reform movement of the shoulder and neck take place afterwards.

This because the neck cannot expand until the bullet leaves and allows the internal surface of the neck to be exposed to the pressure.

But as I said above, the bullet ogive would have hit the lands and the pressure would have pushed the case back to the bolt face....being the line of least resistance...before the bullet has moved out of the case neck.

It is only as the bullet leaves that it progressively exposes the internal surface of the neck to the pressure allowing it to radially expand and grip the chamber wall.

Alan
I think that is all in your imagination.

And that Dalua has correctly described the mechanism that I think is at play. As I already postulated.

Don't think about the case neck, that is not what grips the chamber, it is the body of the case. Which at these pressures is not much stronger than a rubber balloon.

In many rifles the case will be loaded in to the chamber all the way, until it headspaces on the shoulder. If it has e.g. a plunger ejector that will have pushed it forwards when it was loaded. If it doesn't, the firing pin will probably have pushed it forward until it completes it's strike.

Either way, let's just assume that the round starts off all the way into the chamber, and that the headspace is the headspace, i.e. not a few microns, but several thousands of an inch. Typical SAAMI chambers and cases, in combination, can have headspaces of over 10/1000" and still be in spec. NB: this is not the headspace that you can measure with go/nogo gauges in the chamber. It is potentially more.

E.g., for the .308 Win:

1621901362639.webp

Minimum case length to shoulder datum (1.634 - 0.007) = 1.627" minimum.
Maximum chamber length to datum = 1.640"

Thus headspace for a minimum cartridge in a maximum chamber is 13/1000" That's 0.33 mm i.e 330 microns. Assuming that everything is in spec. And who is to say that a reloading die actually stops at precisely cartridge minimum dimension if cranked all the way down ?

Go/nogo on the chamber is only 10/1000" tolerance. 30% less.

Gun goes bang, cartridge stays forward in the chamber, pressure rises inside case until high enough to overcome neck tension and the bullet start moving. By which point the body of the case will already have expanded until it grips the chamber walls tightly. The force (psi x area) to which it is applied, inside that thin-walled elastic cartridge body is far higher than that acting on the base of the bullet. And as the pressure rises further as the bullet is in the first couple of inches of the barrel, it will grip the chamber walls even more tightly.

The neck is the last part to obturate, it only does so, perhaps imperfectly, once the bullet has left it.

I am confident that this is correct. If everything is working correctly the case body will show no signs of sooting/blowby, yet it is common for the neck to be more or less sooted. This only works because the case body, and shoulder, has already obturated before the bullet has left the neck. Otherwise you would get soot all down the case body and shoulder (can happen if the loads are too light).

If the headspace is large, the primer will also be pushed out a little until it hits the bolt face, maybe flattening it. As the pressure in the case diminishes it will relax its grip on the chamber walls and only then be pushed back onto the bolt face, pushing the primer back in, but meanwhile the case may have already stretched at the head/web portion.

Consider, in the limit, with overpressure rounds, that it is even possible for the primers to blow out completely, leaving no trace. That is simply not possible if the case head was being pressed hard against the bolt face, nowhere for the bits to go. QED in that scenario there must have been a gap between case head and bolt face. Maybe simple inertia, primer blown back and out before the inertia of the far heavier case head, and even the rest of the case, if it hasn't already stretched at the web, has been overcome.

This also takes no consideration of any elasticity in the gun itself. Maybe not much of a consideration with those that lock the bolt at the front, but it certainly is with those using rear locking lugs such as Enfields, or lever actions that use a rising block instead.

Sorry, I don't have any slo-mo video to show this.

And, BTW, some military gun proof tests require at least one of the proof rounds to be oiled, to minimise grip on the chamber (anecdotally this can account for 30% of the bolt thrust), so as to stress the action fully.

Well, that's what goes on, in my fertile imagination.

Finally, Alan, how do you explain the well known phenomenon of case thinning at the head/web, potentially leading to separation ? In your your imagination that should never happen, yet it does.

OK, one last conundrum, consider the .303 British, of which I have some experience, since I have one. This is notorious for case head separation if reloaded without understanding the issues.

This headspaces on the rim. SAAMI specs. below, not that many battle rifles were built to SAAMI specs, but humour me.

1621903262658.webp

So, the headspacing at the rim can be between zero and 17/1000" Sloppy eh. ?

And the fit of the case at the shoulder, ignoring headspace variation, anywhere between 0.019" and 0.049". Loose doesn't begin to describe this. Plenty of room for e.g. WW1 mud in there.

And weirder, the chamber shoulder angle is much sharper than the brass shoulder angle (these drawings are to scale). Who'd have thought ? Well the people who designed it did, and made probably the ultimate slick-loading battle round at the time, never intended to be reloaded.

With of course the rear locking lugs and bendy receiver in the equation.

So, what can happen ? Well if you just put the cases into a FL die, cranked down to the shellholder, then don't be surprised to get shoulder splits and head separations PDQ. In two or three reloads. Yet baby your brass, reload so it headspaces off the fireformed shoulder, use lighter loads, and it can last pretty much forever.
 

Attachments

  • 1621898184903.webp
    1621898184903.webp
    52.2 KB · Views: 1
Well done, hoped you would be along to contribute. Pity about the video.

That is food for thought...I read it twice and will again...

I take the point that the main body has a much greater surface area...I have been thinking of the neck having more grip significance because it was the only bit of the case that was parallel and didn't want to move back towards the bolt face as it expanded which the tapering body and shoulder would be inclined to do (see what I did there :) )

My few microns / millimetres comment was slightly poetic, but I was not implying that headspace was an insignificant amount but just that it was in a different order of magnitude to the depth the bullet was seated in the neck. The case only has to move a max of 330 microns whereas the bullet had to move 7mm, over 20 times that to clear using your figures.

I guess it comes down to whether the grip of the tapering case body to the chamber wall is sufficient to prevent the case from moving towards the bolt face when the area of the inside of the case head is larger than the end of the bullet, let alone when the bullet meets the lands. Whether it takes more pressure to deform the bullet to the lands than overcome that friction? Given your point about the oiled case test it could make a huge difference to the grip to the chamber walls if they were rough with a bloom of rust or a polished chamber with a CLP film on it.

The neck is the last part to obturate, it only does so, perhaps imperfectly, once the bullet has left it

Yes, as I tried to describe, the neck must progressively expand behind the bullet, but a soon as the bullet leaves the case mouth and is no longer forming a seal with it, the pressure is no longer just acting on the inside surface as you say, witness the sooty outside of the necks.

Finally, Alan, how do you explain the well known phenomenon of case thinning at the head/web, potentially leading to separation ? In your your imagination that should never happen, yet it does.

I certainly didn't say it should or could never happen, that is your view of my imagination not mine!...but I did agree with paul o' and thought it was more likely to happen if the neck and shoulder were harder and less readily able to fire form to the chamber wall. And that was simply from the point of view that if they had more "give" they would exert less pull away from the head.

Even given my imagined timing of when the case moves the pressure is still on the inside surface of the head pushing it towards the bolt face, I can imagine the inertia of the case body let alone chamber wall grip is possible to overcome the yield point and create the thinning.

Certainly the thinning occurs because the case is not fully supported lengthwise by the chamber so in one way it doesn't really matter whether it is caused by the head being pushed towards the bolt face or the body shoulder and neck being pushed the other way because they are too hard to easily fire form...in which case yours and @Dalua's point that setting the dies is more important comes to bear.

Just small personal experience with some Hornady Match cases which I reloaded by full length sizing to SAAMI spec each time well over 10 reloads. Stress relieved a few times, they were only scrapped when the primers started going in a bit too easily.

Conversely of course if your premise is correct and the case does not move back to the bolt face before the bullet leaves the neck, then annealing, which would aid obturation and grip to the chamber walls, could create more case wall immovability and more thinning in front of the unsupported head. So it would appear you have a choice of either failure by case head separation or by split necks... :(

Alan
 
This looks like another case where a case gauge would be most helpful. I would do your usual resizing and then check it in a case gauge. You might find you are way over doing it. If so, adjust your die.
 
In my thinking, as a round is fired, the rising pressure forces the cartridge head into the bolt face, - so backwards. The length of the case expands against the chamber walls, but importantly, the case shoulder moves forward, obturates (Seals) in the chamber. This then results in the case length 'Growing' and a 'Fireformed' cartridge case from which the fired case headspace dimension may be obtained.
Measured from the centre of the shoulder to the case head on a rimmed cartridge.
Apart from neck tension & concentricity, the case neck is of little importance assuming the case mouth has been trimmed to correct case OAL.

In respect of the case growing in length, the brass is stretched each time the case is fired, resulting in a thinning of the case wall toward the web/case (Approx. 1/4" or so above the web) head where case separation is likely to occur. Evidenced by a bright ring around the case.
This stretching is due to the several thou of space available in a case resized to SAAMI spec rather than a 'Tuned' resizing to correct headspace for the rifle concerned.
I measure the fired case both with primer in & primer de-capped then take an average dimension between the two measurements to set my resizing die to correctly headspace.

Where perhaps, more common in older rifles, the headspace can be excessive, the case may be stretched over one to three reloading's sufficiently to cause the bright ring of a potential case head separation. Definitely undesirable!
Particularly likely if the case is not resized to the fired case headspace dimension.
In this instance the shoulder may be pushed back during resizing, quite a few thou., rather than the .002"-.003" which is far more desirable and should preserve case life much longer.
So, as I see it, there is everything to be gained in having one's F/L resizing die set to resize to the fired case headspace dimension.

Just my thoughts on this subject without being 'Over-technical' & 40+ years of reloading experience.
Oh, & yes, - many years ago I had a MSch stutzen with a load of headspace that caused case head separations.
I was lucky to get two firings from the cases & the third reloading resulted in case head separation. Not nice!
Back then, it took me quite some time to understand what was happening & why.
 
deeangio, I agree that, irrespective of whether the case becomes stretched because the head is forced back to the bolt whilst the body is still gripped tightly in the chamber, or the other way around, as you and Alan suggest, or a bit of both, the net result is that it will elongate. This may not necessarily occur from just above the web, for example if the shoulder and part of the case body have been annealed I would expect them to deform and blow forward more readily than stretching the work hardened and toughened brass at the head separation danger zone. Thankfully head separations are rare, I've never seen one myself, but also try to make sure the cases never reach that point.

Either way, it is surely a good thing to adjust the resizing die to minimise the headspace (or shoulder space) of your cartridges in your rifle's chamber. However they then become bespoke ammo, that only fits your one rifle, which may not be practical for some. Nevertheless it is still legitimate to adjust your resizing die so that the cases are SAAMI maximum dimension, and should still fit any rifle. My suspicion is that many dies are cut, for good reasons, for SAAMI minimum dimension, so the traditional "screw it onto the shellholder then a bit more" adjustment could be counter productive.

My example of the 303 British is an extreme example where the chamber specs. result in the shoulder having to blow forward between 0.019 and 0.049") which is a massive amount. As I said, educated 303 reloaders can minimise this on second firing, but if not the cases can be scrap, or even fail as soon as third firing. Armourers even had a special tool issued to extract the rest of the case from the chamber when this used to happen on first firing.

It can still be an issue with e.g. belted magnums. E.g. the 375 Holland & Holland can have a "headspace" at the shoulder of up to 0.023". 338 LapMag as much as 0.078". Please check my numbers, I just dashed them off. Canny reloaders can minimise this by adjusting their dies.

As to taper of the case body, I think that is moot. Semi modern case designs have minimal taper, you can work it out from the SAAMI drawings, and compare it with that of the chamber. When fired, assuming that they conform to the chamber, it is the taper angle of the chamber that matters, not that of the virgin cartridge case. Olde fashioned things like the .303 and others are more tapered, which brings benefits because they only have to be extracted a small amount to free off any grip from the chamber., by e.g. the small camming action of a bolt. More parallel things don't have that advantage, which in some scenarios might make for harder extraction.

As for the issue of primers possibly blowing out a bit, then being pushed back in again, well the military don't like that possibility, maybe affecting function, so stake them in to try to minimise it. As well as plenty of civilian ammo for similar reasons. Maybe not an issue for simple bolt guns, but certainly in semiautos.

Edit: PS, the military are always on the lookout to improve things, with a drive to reduce the weight and improve the performance of their ammo. Lots of work being done on polymer, or hybrid brass/polymer cases, which seem to be slowly becoming viable, with lots of continuing development. I doubt that they will be coming to civilian rifles soon if ever, nevermind reloaders.

 
Last edited:
I can't be bothered to read all the thread so apologies if this has been covered.
If you use a paperclip, I find it works much better if you sharpen the tip.
 
As you say Sharpie, if one F/L resizes to one's fired case headspace, it is unlikely (Though not impossible) the round will chamber in any other firearm, so it will indeed be a 'Custom' round for the rifle the fired case measurement was taken from.
Frankly, quite what the dynamics are, the fact remains the shoulder must seal against the chamber wall and the measured fired case headspace dimension will then be different to the virgin brass headspace dimension.
It follows then that F/L resized brass tuned to the specific rifle it was fired from and adjusting the resizing die to then bump the case shoulder back .002"-.003" max does reduce the work on the case resulting in extended case life & hopefully better more consistent ammunition - other factors considered as well.

As far as belted magnums are concerned, I don't have any experience of them, but understand they headspace on the belt rather than the case shoulder. Correct or not?
Either way, for me, tuning the case & F/L resizing works a treat, so all my resizing dies are adjusted to .002" bump on case shoulders.
I haven't neck sized in years now, never have chambering issues, case life is brilliant & nor do I ever have to worry about case head separations.
Works for me! :thumb: :)
It's always good to read what others say here on SD ....
 
As far as belted magnums are concerned, I don't have any experience of them, but understand they headspace on the belt rather than the case shoulder. Correct or not?
Correct, the belt on the magnums is analogous to the rim on a flanged cartridge. They headspace on the front of the belt. A more commonplace one, the 300 WinMag:

Cartridge dimension .220 - .008"
Chamber dimension .220 min. .227 max.

So the headspace allowance of the chambered round is between zero and 15/1000" At the belt, not the shoulder.

Then look at the shoulder datum.
Cartridge dimension 2.270 - .007"
Chamber dimension 2.2791 + .010"

So, the shoulder of the cartridge could have a gap to the shoulder of the chamber of between 0.0091" min. and 0.0261" max. Ignoring the belt position tolerance, which is valid.

A reloader cannot adjust the possible headspace variation at the belt. But they can alter the shoulder position to far better match their rifle's chamber, potentially improving case life and even accuracy maybe. Which is what some do, even to the extent that the case then effectively headspaces on the shoulder and any variation in belt position is taken out of the equation.

This chap gives a pretty good explanation about shoulder bumping using FL dies, and specifically about belted magnums at about 33' in:



See also Rim (firearms) - Wikipedia

Disclosure: I have no experience with belted cartridges, but I see them as little different to rimmed cases, just that the belt is a little further forward than the rim.

1622118344701.png
 
Back
Top