CZ550 with Bavarian stock

angusb1

Well-Known Member
Could I have your opinions please on the CZ550 with the Bavarian style cheekpiece and the shortest action? Do you find the Bavarian cheekpiece comfortable/uncomfortable? Do you like the action, the safety, the trigger, the magazine? What don't you like about it? As far as I can tell they have a controlled feed action and if I didn't like the trigger, I could get a Timney to replace it.

Thanks in advance.
 
For me it induces muzzle flip , it really looks odd with a moderator on . Muzzle flip won't be an issue with smaller calibres though . Cz triggers bed in brilliantly with use imo just shoot it lots , it wears to be perfect and safe and I have handjed many badly improved cz triggers that where unsafe by the way thier set trigger is great
 
I can only comment on the Bavarian style stock. I would avoid it if the caliber is anything above .243.
They are the worst on recoil management there is. The Bavarian style Schweinsrücken lets the gun flip up to a good extent. I prefer straight stocks.
 
Thanks guys. I'm looking at one which is in the calibre I want and it ticks all the boxes for me, my only reservation is over the bavarian cheekpiece which I have no experience of. I guess I will never know whether or not I like that kind of stock unless I shoot one. Might have to go and have a look at it.
 
I own one in .243 in fact it was my first centre fire I bought. I thought about customising it a while back but then changed my mind as it shoots so well and I love the action. Push the trigger forward gives you the feather option otherwise there is a fairly stiff pull. I might one day consider threading it for a mod but tbh I love it the way it is. I also have the same style of stock on my steyr mannlicher stutzen in 270. I like the way they look feel and handle albeit you need to hang on to the 270.
As always good for some and not others👍🏻
 
The CZ trigger is easily user adjusted, I did mine and no issues. Instructions were in the manual so............bought the tools and went at it. Mine is the 550 varmint laminate with a vastly differing stock design. One of the most accurate rifles I have ever purchased.
 
To be precise the cheek piece be it Bavarian, German or Frech is quite irrelevant, it‘s just optics. The relevant bit for recoil management is the comb of the stock.
 
I suppose it depends to a large extent on your own personal morphology and shooting style, but I have two rifles with Bavarian hogsback stocks and I find they suit me very well, come up well to the shoulder, align the eye well with the scope. I'll say that before I bought my first rifle, I handled a lot of them at Holts auction previews for fun and to find out what suited me. You can't do that anymore of course. Even before Covid, Holt's relocated to somewhere inaccessible. The occasional buyer now needs to do so blind. But I daresay they made no money from the likes of me.
 
I have a Timney and an aftermarket synthetic stock on my CZ550 7x64 - just couldn’t get on with the look of a Bavarian stock, a scope and a moderator. Superbly accurate rifle with a “proper” action 🍿
 
I had a CZ550 in 243 with a hogs back stock. It was threaded for a moderator. I never had a problem with the stock shape or perceived the recoil to be any worse than the CF2 that preceded it. Or other rifles I have fired. The trigger on mine was very good light enough without being dangerous with thin gloves on or cold hands. The set trigger was handy for zeroing and from a very steady rest.
All in all I really liked my 550. The only reason I sold it was a deal to good to miss on a Sauer 202.
A lad on here bought it he might if he sees this give his opinion.

I would buy another for instance a magnum version for a trip abroad (assuming I couldn’t find a 202) I still own its little brother in the 527 it is not for sale.
 
I had a CZ550 in 243 with a hogs back stock. It was threaded for a moderator. I never had a problem with the stock shape or perceived the recoil to be any worse than the CF2 that preceded it. Or other rifles I have fired. The trigger on mine was very good light enough without being dangerous with thin gloves on or cold hands. The set trigger was handy for zeroing and from a very steady rest.
All in all I really liked my 550. The only reason I sold it was a deal to good to miss on a Sauer 202.
A lad on here bought it he might if he sees this give his opinion.

I would buy another for instance a magnum version for a trip abroad (assuming I couldn’t find a 202) I still own its little brother in the 527 it is not for sale.
Funnily enough a Sauer 202 is one of the other options I am considering.
 
Funnily enough a Sauer 202 is one of the other options I am considering.
The Sauer is a lovely rifle, it just feels right (to me) and has a versatility that sold it to me.
The gunsmith that did one of my rifles has a couple as his personal rifles. I had a go with one of them. The fact I can get a new barrel without my rifle being out of use for much if any time. Along with the ability to get anything from 220 swift (22-250 doesn’t load reliably) to 35 Whelen in the same rifle appeals to me. I have 6.5x55 and 270 I will probably add something else to that at some point.
I would like to get a magnum actioned one too. I like the idea of picking up any rifle and it being completely natural to handle.

Don’t get me wrong I loved my CZ (still have one) but the Sauer is a different animal.
I can swap the stock (I have a wooden one as well) from synthetic. Take it off without worrying about zero loss. Mine came with a Picatinny rail which makes barrel swaps an easy job. I have a scope for each barrel and use a torque screwdriver when changing either.
 
The Sauer is a lovely rifle, it just feels right (to me) and has a versatility that sold it to me.
The gunsmith that did one of my rifles has a couple as his personal rifles. I had a go with one of them. The fact I can get a new barrel without my rifle being out of use for much if any time. Along with the ability to get anything from 220 swift (22-250 doesn’t load reliably) to 35 Whelen in the same rifle appeals to me. I have 6.5x55 and 270 I will probably add something else to that at some point.
I would like to get a magnum actioned one too. I like the idea of picking up any rifle and it being completely natural to handle.

Don’t get me wrong I loved my CZ (still have one) but the Sauer is a different animal.
I can swap the stock (I have a wooden one as well) from synthetic. Take it off without worrying about zero loss. Mine came with a Picatinny rail which makes barrel swaps an easy job. I have a scope for each barrel and use a torque screwdriver when changing either.
These are exactly the reasons I am thinking about a Sauer 202. I won't know how I feel about the safety and fit of the stock until I try one but they are by all accounts very well built and they make a barrel in the calibre I want as well as other calibres that are easy to get a good choice of ammo for which could easily solve any problem I had with ammo supply if I were to travel and my ammo didn't arrive for some reason. I want to try a couple of more traditional alternatives as well, probably a Sako 75 or L691 and maybe the CZ550. Once I have tried a few different rifles I will know what fits me and feels right. The Sauer looks like a winner on paper but until I try one out I won't know if it's worth the extra money over a CZ, Tikka or Sako.
 
These are exactly the reasons I am thinking about a Sauer 202. I won't know how I feel about the safety and fit of the stock until I try one but they are by all accounts very well built and they make a barrel in the calibre I want as well as other calibres that are easy to get a good choice of ammo for which could easily solve any problem I had with ammo supply if I were to travel and my ammo didn't arrive for some reason. I want to try a couple of more traditional alternatives as well, probably a Sako 75 or L691 and maybe the CZ550. Once I have tried a few different rifles I will know what fits me and feels right. The Sauer looks like a winner on paper but until I try one out I won't know if it's worth the extra money over a CZ, Tikka or Sako.
Ok so the safety is a bit marmite. Personally I don’t mind it, if you keep your thumb on it as you push the button in the trigger guard it’s silent.
My CZ had a three position safety and I did like it. The action takes a bit of a knack to get smooth reloading, but once learned comes without thinking.
Sako 75 is a nice rifle too, a step up in build quality from the CZ. I have an action one in 20 Tac (223 based wildcat) and it is my go to for fox and vermin. Even though the CZ527 in 222 makes silly small holes. The Sako is just more refined.
I might even be tempted to get a 223 Sauer and go down the “one gun” route. But it is not a priority as the Sako is filling that ATM.

The Sauer does have advantages that you cannot beat without having another switch barrel rifle. However I wouldn’t discount a CZ but it would have to be cheaper than the alternatives. I think I paid around £200 for my CZ the Sauer cost me £500 before adding mounts and the second barrel. But it was ridiculously cheap, I think the seller was too honest in his description of its previous use (culling serious numbers) and the marks on the stock etc. Didn’t bother me as I expect something to be used, not be an ornament. Saying that I have a nice stock now too. But I have been lucky to be in the right place at the right time.
I do honestly believe barring some kind of failure that makes it an uneconomic repair. I will be using the 202 for many years.
A word of caution though, I am not sure if you are aware. The 202 comes with either a 3 or 6 lug bolt. The 6 lug starts at 6.5x55, the 243 and 22-250 are the same action but 3 lug. The ‘smith had a 243 barrel fitted to his 6 lug (there’s adapters for the job). I might be tempted to get a fast twist one one day.
The 223 etc is a different bolt again I have half an eye out for a deal on one of them. Other than that I am pretty much sorted with what is in the cabinet.
 
Ok so the safety is a bit marmite. Personally I don’t mind it, if you keep your thumb on it as you push the button in the trigger guard it’s silent.
My CZ had a three position safety and I did like it. The action takes a bit of a knack to get smooth reloading, but once learned comes without thinking.
Sako 75 is a nice rifle too, a step up in build quality from the CZ. I have an action one in 20 Tac (223 based wildcat) and it is my go to for fox and vermin. Even though the CZ527 in 222 makes silly small holes. The Sako is just more refined.
I might even be tempted to get a 223 Sauer and go down the “one gun” route. But it is not a priority as the Sako is filling that ATM.

The Sauer does have advantages that you cannot beat without having another switch barrel rifle. However I wouldn’t discount a CZ but it would have to be cheaper than the alternatives. I think I paid around £200 for my CZ the Sauer cost me £500 before adding mounts and the second barrel. But it was ridiculously cheap, I think the seller was too honest in his description of its previous use (culling serious numbers) and the marks on the stock etc. Didn’t bother me as I expect something to be used, not be an ornament. Saying that I have a nice stock now too. But I have been lucky to be in the right place at the right time.
I do honestly believe barring some kind of failure that makes it an uneconomic repair. I will be using the 202 for many years.
A word of caution though, I am not sure if you are aware. The 202 comes with either a 3 or 6 lug bolt. The 6 lug starts at 6.5x55, the 243 and 22-250 are the same action but 3 lug. The ‘smith had a 243 barrel fitted to his 6 lug (there’s adapters for the job). I might be tempted to get a fast twist one one day.
The 223 etc is a different bolt again I have half an eye out for a deal on one of them. Other than that I am pretty much sorted with what is in the cabinet.
What CZ550 do you have with a 3 position safety?
 
I have a CZ550 FS with the hog back stock . It’s in 6.5x55 and is scoped . However the combination of that bastard comb stock and the rings needed to Mount the scope makes it not the most comfortable rifle to shoot . It shoots extremely well with handloads and the single set trigger in the gun is very nice . I’ve shot plenty 1/2” or less 100 yard groups from the bench as it’s not an issue scrunching around , but in the field I can’t say I’m totally happy with the low low comb on the gun . My chin sits on top the comb to see thru the scope clearly .
 
Back
Top