Deer Control - out of season

Sorry muddy I missed that bit. Because it was Scotland and didn't affect me I was only half listening while making breakfast. :oops:
 
In Scotland I have heard that the Forestry Commission stopped all deer stalking due to COVID and are facing a backlog. I have also heard they will start shooting roe does a month early (i.e. 21st September not 21st October) presumably with a formal licence.

Perhaps someone can confirm.
Yes they stopped all stalking during the peak of covid lock down.

And yes they start does in September but that has been the case for a number of years and is nothing to do with covid. This is done under an SNH out of season licence.
 
Not sure about FC, but with Fit and Competent certificate from SNH and Written approval from land owner, Does can be taken 1st September in cases of crop protection.

Female deer of any species during the period of any statutory close season, but not including the period 1st April to 31st August;
 
just listened, it refers to red deer not roe "Scotland is to move the hind stalking season to the first of September" for commercial operators. It refers to a decision by Forestry and Land Scotland and SNH
At the moment that is only a recommendation, but probably likely to be implemented.
There is however a general authorisation issue by SNH that allows out of season culling in certain circumstances
 
Ok just to say that I have shot deer in the past for crop protection .when they have gotten in to the barley fields and done quit a bit of damage to the crop.
I have shot them with a shotgun and with slugs and also used a .243 .
Not stalking just crop protection for my pals who Farm .
Not sure how anyone would know what I was doing as the deer were only a couple of hundred yards from the crow banger going off all day!! .
We just did the job and kept quite .
The Roe ended up in the freezer so nothing wasted.
we only had to shoot one to stop the problem generally for the season.
No drama and all above board.
 
Just as a matter of interest does anyone in England on here have any experience ( not anecdotal) of this becoming a legal issue. Any idea when the last time the ‘Farmers Defence’ was used in court?
 
Just as a matter of interest does anyone in England on here have any experience ( not anecdotal) of this becoming a legal issue. Any idea when the last time the ‘Farmers Defence’ was used in court?
I’m also interested. Sadly reading about quad thefts, hare coursing and recently a commercial scale salmon netting poaching operation that lasted years I don’t know that the police have the time/inclination to pursue this. I’m a novice but I’d always respect seasons out of decency and common sense. However, is out of season deer shooting is likely to cause anyone an actual practical problem?
 
I’m also interested. Sadly reading about quad thefts, hare coursing and recently a commercial scale salmon netting poaching operation that lasted years I don’t know that the police have the time/inclination to pursue this. I’m a novice but I’d always respect seasons out of decency and common sense. However, is out of season deer shooting is likely to cause anyone an actual practical problem?

It causes the orphaned calves and kids an actual practical problem.
 
As Lee mentioned you'd want to have a decent stack of evidence photos and the like showing what you had done to try and persuade the deer to leave the crops alone, scarecrows etc and evidence of the significant damage caused, if it is just a small corner of a field I'd suggest that would be a tough argument to make. Unless there is material damage you are wondering around on some thin creaky ice, just get the correct license and save all the hassle and paranoia, just need one person who knows the rules to see you at it and you are scuppered without the proper documents. Always easier to do things the right way first, you may well get your guns back eventually but not having them for a while sat with the bobbies would be a tad tedious.
 
Just as a matter of interest does anyone in England on here have any experience ( not anecdotal) of this becoming a legal issue. Any idea when the last time the ‘Farmers Defence’ was used in court?
Nearly, I had give statement to a police inspector after shooting a CWD on a live airfield while waiting (4 months) for Nature England to issue a license. we advised NE of the dispatching of the CWD then NE reported the airport and myself to the police. The Inspector contacted NE the same day as I gave my statement and we received the license by email the following day.
 
Last edited:
It causes the orphaned calves and kids an actual practical problem.
Yea obviously. As I wrote the reasons for not doing it are “decency and common sense”. But given current enforcement the legality seems borderline irrelevant.
 
Using an OS license does not in itself leave orphans. The practitioner should make every effort to prevent this throughout the shooting season of females whether this is within the statutory season or within the periods when a OS license is being put to use. It's the ability, judgement and skill of the controller. If a controller shoots a family group of roe(2kids and the doe) using OS license conditions a week or two before the statutory season is that worse animal welfare than shooting during the first few weeks of the statutory season in a scenario where only the doe is shot
 
As Lee mentioned you'd want to have a decent stack of evidence photos and the like showing what you had done to try and persuade the deer to leave the crops alone, scarecrows etc and evidence of the significant damage caused, if it is just a small corner of a field I'd suggest that would be a tough argument to make. Unless there is material damage you are wondering around on some thin creaky ice, just get the correct license and save all the hassle and paranoia, just need one person who knows the rules to see you at it and you are scuppered without the proper documents. Always easier to do things the right way first, you may well get your guns back eventually but not having them for a while sat with the bobbies would be a tad tedious.
As a farmer I am a bit surprised with the attitude that we should just put up with damage, damage is damage regardless of whether it is ‘ just a corner’. That is the whole point of the ‘FarmersDefence’. Or go through the proper channel and wait 4 months for a license.
SSS
 
As a farmer I am a bit surprised with the attitude that we should just put up with damage, damage is damage regardless of whether it is ‘ just a corner’. That is the whole point of the ‘FarmersDefence’. Or go through the proper channel and wait 4 months for a license.
SSS
Yes, agreed I shoot foxes for a local farmer. He was getting problems one lambing time so we were having a chat about what was happening. I referred to 1 of the local do gooders complaining about foxes getting shot. He said "it would be a different story if someone was going into their bank account every night and taking a chunk of their money"
 
Using an OS license does not in itself leave orphans. The practitioner should make every effort to prevent this throughout the shooting season of females whether this is within the statutory season or within the periods when a OS license is being put to use. It's the ability, judgement and skill of the controller. If a controller shoots a family group of roe(2kids and the doe) using OS license conditions a week or two before the statutory season is that worse animal welfare than shooting during the first few weeks of the statutory season in a scenario where only the doe is shot
On paper, I agree. However, as we discussed on the other thread, the denouement on the ground is often quite different. This is even more the case under the "farmer's defence" (as here) than it is under proper OSS because the control is often conducted by those not accustomed to out-of-season shooting. No disrespect meant but a Wiltshire foxer or stalker simply doesn't have the same experience as a highland contractor.
 
Back
Top