Yes they stopped all stalking during the peak of covid lock down.In Scotland I have heard that the Forestry Commission stopped all deer stalking due to COVID and are facing a backlog. I have also heard they will start shooting roe does a month early (i.e. 21st September not 21st October) presumably with a formal licence.
Perhaps someone can confirm.
At the moment that is only a recommendation, but probably likely to be implemented.just listened, it refers to red deer not roe "Scotland is to move the hind stalking season to the first of September" for commercial operators. It refers to a decision by Forestry and Land Scotland and SNH
I’m also interested. Sadly reading about quad thefts, hare coursing and recently a commercial scale salmon netting poaching operation that lasted years I don’t know that the police have the time/inclination to pursue this. I’m a novice but I’d always respect seasons out of decency and common sense. However, is out of season deer shooting is likely to cause anyone an actual practical problem?Just as a matter of interest does anyone in England on here have any experience ( not anecdotal) of this becoming a legal issue. Any idea when the last time the ‘Farmers Defence’ was used in court?
I’m also interested. Sadly reading about quad thefts, hare coursing and recently a commercial scale salmon netting poaching operation that lasted years I don’t know that the police have the time/inclination to pursue this. I’m a novice but I’d always respect seasons out of decency and common sense. However, is out of season deer shooting is likely to cause anyone an actual practical problem?
It causes the orphaned calves and kids an actual practical problem.
Nearly, I had give statement to a police inspector after shooting a CWD on a live airfield while waiting (4 months) for Nature England to issue a license. we advised NE of the dispatching of the CWD then NE reported the airport and myself to the police. The Inspector contacted NE the same day as I gave my statement and we received the license by email the following day.Just as a matter of interest does anyone in England on here have any experience ( not anecdotal) of this becoming a legal issue. Any idea when the last time the ‘Farmers Defence’ was used in court?
Yea obviously. As I wrote the reasons for not doing it are “decency and common sense”. But given current enforcement the legality seems borderline irrelevant.It causes the orphaned calves and kids an actual practical problem.
Following the law doesn't become more or less necessary depending upon the likelihood of discovery.Yea obviously. As I wrote the reasons for not doing it are “decency and common sense”. But given current enforcement the legality seems borderline irrelevant.
As a farmer I am a bit surprised with the attitude that we should just put up with damage, damage is damage regardless of whether it is ‘ just a corner’. That is the whole point of the ‘FarmersDefence’. Or go through the proper channel and wait 4 months for a license.As Lee mentioned you'd want to have a decent stack of evidence photos and the like showing what you had done to try and persuade the deer to leave the crops alone, scarecrows etc and evidence of the significant damage caused, if it is just a small corner of a field I'd suggest that would be a tough argument to make. Unless there is material damage you are wondering around on some thin creaky ice, just get the correct license and save all the hassle and paranoia, just need one person who knows the rules to see you at it and you are scuppered without the proper documents. Always easier to do things the right way first, you may well get your guns back eventually but not having them for a while sat with the bobbies would be a tad tedious.
Yes, agreed I shoot foxes for a local farmer. He was getting problems one lambing time so we were having a chat about what was happening. I referred to 1 of the local do gooders complaining about foxes getting shot. He said "it would be a different story if someone was going into their bank account every night and taking a chunk of their money"As a farmer I am a bit surprised with the attitude that we should just put up with damage, damage is damage regardless of whether it is ‘ just a corner’. That is the whole point of the ‘FarmersDefence’. Or go through the proper channel and wait 4 months for a license.
SSS
On paper, I agree. However, as we discussed on the other thread, the denouement on the ground is often quite different. This is even more the case under the "farmer's defence" (as here) than it is under proper OSS because the control is often conducted by those not accustomed to out-of-season shooting. No disrespect meant but a Wiltshire foxer or stalker simply doesn't have the same experience as a highland contractor.Using an OS license does not in itself leave orphans. The practitioner should make every effort to prevent this throughout the shooting season of females whether this is within the statutory season or within the periods when a OS license is being put to use. It's the ability, judgement and skill of the controller. If a controller shoots a family group of roe(2kids and the doe) using OS license conditions a week or two before the statutory season is that worse animal welfare than shooting during the first few weeks of the statutory season in a scenario where only the doe is shot
nobody seems to bat an eyelid when they shoot a milky vixen in spring although the end result is the sameThat problem being not learning how to survive at best and a slow death through starvation at worst
ok ok ok, you know what I mean, don’t get all sensitive.That's where your wrong !