Expander mandrel die vs standard…

gixer1

Well-Known Member
I recently started using Hornady custom dies with an expander mandrel - and previously was using Lee dies, both did the job very well, however I can feel a different resistance when cycling the press and I swear I can feel different neck tension when seating…

So are expander mandrel type dies beneficial over the Lee standard type dies??

Regards,
Gixer
 
It will definitely be beneficial to casa life if you don‘t squeeze the necks to death on sizing with a standard die.
 
I measured the expander in my Hornady .243 die -- .241 the same as my mandrel . I saw no difference down range or felt any difference at the press , all of my brass was annealed and my testing wasn't definitive , in that I didn't do a side by side velocity comparison .
The expander mandrel now keeps my primer pocket uniformers company , out of sight in a drawer .
 
It will definitely be beneficial to casa life if you don‘t squeeze the necks to death on sizing with a standard die.
(From Hornady)
CUSTOM GRADE DIES
4. ELLIPTICAL EXPANDER

Superior to “ball expanders,” this Hornady® exclusive provides extremely smooth neck sizing and significantly reduces friction and case neck stretch. Internal threading prevents it from pulling loose and the elliptical expander eliminates the need for a separate expander die for necking-up to the next caliber.

I suspect the OP and Steff are talking about different dies here.;)

The Hornady Custom Grade Dies come with an elliptical expander rather than the standard straight-sided expander ball in RCBS and Lyman dies. All these brands work the same way by squeezing the expanded neck down by 10/1000" to sub-calibre, then expanding it back to 2/1000" below bullet diameter.

I think Post #2 is referring to a LEE Collet Neck Sizer dies which come with a parallel-sided mandrel 2/1000" below bullet diameter. The collet jaws in the die squeeze the neck onto the mandrel so the neck isn't worked half as much as it is with standard FLR or NSZ dies, as there's no expansion phase.

Since 2000 standard Lee FLR dies have been fitted with EZ-X expander stems which already are tapered expanders. I rather think Hornady stole this idea from LEE as there's no practical difference between the two brands in effort or feel. To neck up cases I've now got a full set of LEE EZ-X expander stems from .17 to .45. These are available as spare parts, which I doubt Hornady are.
 
I recently started using Hornady custom dies with an expander mandrel - and previously was using Lee dies, both did the job very well, however I can feel a different resistance when cycling the press and I swear I can feel different neck tension when seating…

So are expander mandrel type dies beneficial over the Lee standard type dies??

Regards,
Gixer
Just my experience, so take it with a grain of salt, but expander mandrels seem to give a more consistent results with less stress on the case for me.

A standard or elliptical expander will work for most, especially if these are hunting rounds. But for LR precision ammunition, I find the expander mandrel a better solution for consistent neck tension. Plus, neck expander mandrels don't rely so much on case lube being inside the neck, where standard FL dies, you can feel differing amounts of stress when pulling the expander through the neck, depending on how much case lube gets in the neck. I often wonder if there is a slight distortion of the shoulder, as that expander mandrel tugs up on the case at the juncture between the shoulder and neck.

For automated case processing (I personally believe) neck expanding mandrels are pretty much necessary. This is because the shell plates on the machines (Dillon progressive presses) can be on the thin side, and you can see the stress/pressure as the FL sizer die mandrel gets drug up through the neck, and see the shell plate flex differently, depending on the amount of case lube that gets inside the neck. Does it make a difference in the final product? <shrug> Not sure. But if consistency is the name of the game, I prefer bumping back shoulders in one step, and then opening up necks in another. Just less wear and tear on the machine, as well as less stoppages if you tear off a rim (which then the next case gets run into, causing two lost cases, and a stoppage). And when running with an Autodrive, stoppages or torn case rims that may not cause a stoppage, means you're destroying a crap ton of cases before you can hit the emergency stop button. Nothing worse than looking over at a machine, and seeing squashed cases coming out of the brass chute....

Finally, I tend to take a cue from the manufacturers, who typically open up the neck to final dimensions is a separate step after drawing and forming the shoulder. Id imagine they do it for a reason, though it may just be due to the tooling machine itself. Regardless, I think it just reduces fatigue on the case, doing it separate steps.

JMTCW...
 
Back
Top