Kahles Range Finder Binos

Seanhall

Member
Looking to see if anyone has had similar issues? I’ve had my kahles almost 4 years now.
The range finder for some reason has started to only show half of distance on display when pressing the range button? As in it’s cutting the numbers in half.

Is this a battery fault or fault with the rangefinder unit its self?

Thanks
 
What are they like optically? Do they compare with the likes of Leica, Zeiss?
I can’t fault them at all on last light quality, great pair of Binos for money you pay I’ve compared them against the Zeiss range finders and can’t notice a difference, the swaros are almost £1000 more expensive so there quality is a bit better. But in comparisons there great
 
On mine the display failed. I sent them to Kahles and they gave my a new pair of the next generation for a surcharge of EUR 100, which I found fair.
NowI‘m using a GPO 10x32 Rangeguide. I‘m perfectly happy with them. They do the job and don‘t cost a fortune. I will buy top notch regular binos for a hell of a lot of money any time, but not electronic stuff which is bound to fail sooner or later.
 
On mine the display failed. I sent them to Kahles and they gave my a new pair of the next generation for a surcharge of EUR 100, which I found fair.
NowI‘m using a GPO 10x32 Rangeguide. I‘m perfectly happy with them. They do the job and don‘t cost a fortune. I will buy top notch regular binos for a hell of a lot of money any time, but not electronic stuff which is bound to fail sooner or later.
Yeah this is what I am trying to weigh up. I have good quality Leica regular binos and a seperate range finder. I still want the quality optics but added rangfinder. Khales have a good rep for optics and their range finder binos look a a good deal, but can they be trusted electronically?
 
Yeah this is what I am trying to weigh up. I have good quality Leica regular binos and a seperate range finder. I still want the quality optics but added rangfinder. Khales have a good rep for optics and their range finder binos look a a good deal, but can they be trusted electronically?
Kahles range finder binos are not made in Austria, but made in Asia. This doesn't necessarily mean they are bad. But they do not deserve the 'premium bonus' the Kahles brand name suggests. Regardless of where they are made, electronics do fail at some point. Just look at the warranty conditions on all the electronic components in optics both cheap and expensive.
 
Leica LRF Geovid R Bino's are the only European made offering and cost £1350. Vortex, Steiner, Kahles etc are made in Asia.

Most Hand Held Thermal's now have an offering of an LRF Model, which for some brands ie Pulsar have a 3year Warranty on Electronics vs 2 year with LRF Bino's.

Pulsar recently upgraded their Warranty to 5 years, though I think this was in the US. It suggests they believe in their product lasting 5years with no issues.

Regular Bino's with great optical performance, and a combined Thermal / LRF seems the way forward especially with the Pulsar Telos (infinitely upgradeable).
 
Good quality glass binos aren't light and neither is a Pulsar Telos
I certainly wouldn't want to walk any distance with both hanging round my neck and a gun over my shoulder
BTW don't buy in the Pulsar "infinitely upgradeable" hype - if you bought a Telos XL50 you've reached the performance ceiling - you could only downgrade from there

Cheers

Bruce
 
All depends on the kit you choose to use.

A pair of x32's can be just as good for most stalkers, as the glass quality has improved so much. But, marketing spiel directs most to x42's.

Both Bino and Thermal shoulder harnesses mitigate any strain on the neck these days. It's up to the individual if they choose to use them.

Pulsar Telos XL50. Not everyone has 4k to spend out as a first purchase but I understand your example. I suspect given the rate of product development and as sensor performance improves there will always be room for upgrade(s). The advantage with the Telos, is that you can purchase a budget unit and upgrade performance over time to suit a budget. No other manufacturer has developed this forethought of a standardised model, instead is just intent on selling a redesigned evolution of the same product every year.

I am not a Pulsar advocate/Owner, but having owned various Asian made products, some with Warranty issues, it does make you reconsider where and when hard earned money is spent, and the quality of the product on offer and it's realtime expected lifetime before it expires. We live in a world where many manufacturers no longer in believe in producing products built to last, the focus is very much now on a short lifetime and repeatable purchasing for the next best product.
 
A secondhand pair of Leica HD-B’s can be had for £1400 or there abouts. I know people bleat on about warranty but let’s be honest a warranty is there not to be relied upon. There is nothing to match European Glass. Yes Asian glass is getting better but it’s still not quite there. I was out half an hour after sun down on Thursday with my HD-B’s and could still view into the shadows of the wood line. The stalker has a C50 scope because he preferred the last light picture. I hated it to be honest. It was incredibly grainy and the true picture offered through decent glass is far more relaxing on the eye. The C50 was on base mag as well and still seemed to have a snow affect on the picture.

Yes a thermal with rangefinder and your current binoculars is also an option. But the convenience of the binocular with rangefinder when viewing the target in a true picture feels more natural to me. But it’s what you get used to.
 
Hmmm.
A pal returned his as the lrf failed to work. Replaced as too expensive to repair - exactly the same as another pal - his failed in Africa!
Disappointing to say the least…,
🦊🦊
 
Back
Top