Lets see how the BBC gets out of this one !!!!!!

No one is dim, but if you cant make a post without insulting a fellow member of this site, your light in the SD world will become dim. And eventually go out. If members cant be respectful to each other, either don't respond or leave.
Don’t read the deer feeding thread then chap.
You may have palpitations 😂😎👍
 
arent his issue to do with climate change promises? pretty string link to wildlife.
Strong as in frequently repeated. Climate change presents no particular problem to wildlife as a whole.
i think people hate him because he is better at playing the game than most.
Personally, I'm more irked that money is extorted from me and the large majority of other people who don't watch his programmes and used to fund and promote him and his views and campaigns some of which are really quite wacky. Packham's actual audience is small.
only reason the general license fiasco happen was because we didnt use the old one correctly.
No. The general licence fiasco happened because the 1981 wildlife protection act (the precise name eludes me) was bad EU legislation applied here in a harmful way. At the time everyone was assured that it wouldn't be used in this way and dealing with corvids and pigeons wasn't a problem. The general licences were a fudge and Packham et al campaigned for the fudge to be reduced.
In fact what ahold have happened post Brexit is that the legislation ought to have been repealed and replaced with legislation appropriate to the UK's environment.
we should all be calling out lying politicians.
Hear hear
i think this will change nothing within the bbc
Should we also call out the BBC where it is dishonest, or does accountability only extend to the people we elect, not the greater numbers we are compelled to pay for?
 
Strong as in frequently repeated. Climate change presents no particular problem to wildlife as a whole.

Personally, I'm more irked that money is extorted from me and the large majority of other people who don't watch his programmes and used to fund and promote him and his views and campaigns some of which are really quite wacky. Packham's actual audience is small.

No. The general licence fiasco happened because the 1981 wildlife protection act (the precise name eludes me) was bad EU legislation applied here in a harmful way. At the time everyone was assured that it wouldn't be used in this way and dealing with corvids and pigeons wasn't a problem. The general licences were a fudge and Packham et al campaigned for the fudge to be reduced.
In fact what ahold have happened post Brexit is that the legislation ought to have been repealed and replaced with legislation appropriate to the UK's environment.

Hear hear

Should we also call out the BBC where it is dishonest, or does accountability only extend to the people we elect, not the greater numbers we are compelled to pay for?
yes to the last bit, every thing that is publicly funded should be accountable.
climate change is a very grey area, to say
Climate change presents no particular problem to wildlife as a whole
i think either over simplifies it or disregades it.
i think we broadly agree
 
All of that is just magic
But it misses the point that he is not making apolitical comment, he is undertaking a legal action against the governments failure to fulfill commitments.
( I understand the nuances but there is a difference)

He is completely entitled to take legal action against whoever he likes.
Never mind the fact that a huge portion of the populace would support him.
I think the quicker folk realise that hating CP puts them in the minority the easier life will be for them.
I would think the Legal Profession would be rubbing their hands at the thought of people regulaly taking the government to court for failing to do things they promised, the money would never stop flowing
 
The camera man of Spring Watch called him over and said

"We've got a nickname for you. From now on you'll be known as Thrush"

"I'm flattered" says Cwiss "being given the name of a song bird"

"Nothing to do with a bird" says the man "it's because you're an irritating c*nt"
 
He doesn't need to the more thick amongst the Guardian istana,s will be having a whip around.
Why spend your own money when the gullible are willing to send theirs.
All donations to St Chris of broadcasting House it will be squandered sorry spent wisely 🫣
 
Back
Top