Dear Mr Perkins
We have corresponded on shooting issues previously.
I am very concerned by the proposal to make shotguns section one. I am both a section 2 and section 1 certificate holder.
Those of us with legally held firearms are the most law abiding members of society. I couple of speeding tickets alone could lead to a licensing authority to question my suitability to possess firearms.
The security required are extensive and assessed prior to grant and on each renewal. Consequently theft of legally held firearms are extremely low. There subseqent use in crime I believe virtually non existent.
Therefore what reason is there to increase the license requirement.
Certificate holders need a letter from their doctor, two referees of professional standing, a criminal record declaration and check.
Many shotguns section 2 are used for vermin control on farms and clay pigeon shooting.
For section one you need to prove a need, and signed permission by land owners.
I have held a shotgun certificate since I was 15. 55 years now.
Police firearms licencing departments are under staffed and under funded, Derbyshire is good compared to many but making shotguns section 1 will increase the amount of work immensely leading to greater delays in grants and renewal.
Far more unchecked people get a driving licence that lasts for decades no checks unless they come to the attention of the police.
Firearms could move from 5 years to 10 years unless offences are committed, or GP reports an issue in fact rather like a DVLA system.
With section 1 the police decide what firearms I can have how many and how much ammunition I can hold.
The shooting community puts 2 billion pounds per annum into the economy.
The current system is not perfect but it's safe. Why change it for the worse.
I urge you not to support these changes and support shooters and supporting industry.
Thank you
basc.org.uk
