Missing ball joint on muntjac

Vapours

Well-Known Member
Whilst preparing a muntjac recently I found that on one of the rear haunch there was no ball joint. Instead there were simply two flat planes that seemed to rub against each other.

There was a significant difference in size between the two haunchs

The gait was odd but not exceptionally so. All glands were checked and were ok
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240531_120335.webp
    IMG_20240531_120335.webp
    248.8 KB · Views: 91
  • IMG_20240531_121852.webp
    IMG_20240531_121852.webp
    264.1 KB · Views: 90
  • IMG_20240531_121441.webp
    IMG_20240531_121441.webp
    198.8 KB · Views: 90
  • IMG_20240531_125454.webp
    IMG_20240531_125454.webp
    208.6 KB · Views: 89
How strange - and interesting! Thank you for posting the photos.

I wonder if it was born that way or if it was related to some earlier injury?
 
Interesting, my thought would be an injury very early in life or perhaps a congenital abnormality as normal hip anatomy is not present. Hip dysplasia cases start with a normal joint that then progressively remodels resulting in infilling of the socket and remodelling of the femoral head css as used by the laxity of the joint. Even in advanced cases they don’t end up like this. The paper kindly referenced by @Triggermortis shows this nicely (see photo attached) as in this animal the natural socket joint is clearly identifiable ventral and caudal to the pseudarthrosis (false joint) indicated by the arrow. Fractures of the femoral head and/or neck leave fragments present and the remains of the femoral head in the socket are generally well preserved and identifiable. Even in cases where surgery has been performed to excise the femoral head and neck, the socket should be identifiable. The absence of any form of a socket suggests that this abnormality started very early in skeletal development because there is no evidence of there ever having a socket or normal femoral head.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3936.webp
    IMG_3936.webp
    38 KB · Views: 5
Whilst preparing a muntjac recently I found that on one of the rear haunch there was no ball joint. Instead there were simply two flat planes that seemed to rub against each other.

There was a significant difference in size between the two haunchs

The gait was odd but not exceptionally so. All glands were checked and were ok
I have seen a muntjac with a fused leg joint also this

20200822_221613[1] (1).webp
 
Back
Top