I can give you the comparison. I sent the blade back and still have the Wraith. The Blade came nowhere close to the Wraith when used with a rear add on. It was woeful. I emailed my dissatisfaction with an ask to return and following Clive's direction to have me adjust it (as above) to meet the needs of a rear add on, it still fell well short of the boasted performance. The Wraith beat it hands down. I then emailed again to ask on returns process. Strangely the first email was responded to immediately and the second email took forever to respond to and when I returned via recorded delivery, I had to chase my refund (I luckily had myself covered with evidence of return etc.). Buyer beware, if you have a dedicated nv scope it might be grand, but it comes nowhere close to the claimed performance for rear add on use and the customer service ebbs somewhat when the feedback lands. Cheers.
I've managed to check back on this. It was quite easy to find as since launch mid last year, we have only had two returned for 'not enough power' and one return where the customer had ordered the wrong wavelength. Three in total.
All I can say is, there are a lot of variables in an add on setup. Mines a fairly optimal scope and I can get a good image at 500 yards, and indeed illumination of tree lines at beyond 1000 with an MTC Mamba RIR 4-16x50 and an NV007V at around 10x magnification. Others are also finding the performance with an add on is absolutely fine too. There are videos on YouTube demonstrating that performance. Some day scopes will need a lot more IR, or something else might have been happening in your case. It's impossible to say.
Unfortunately due to new laser safety and product safety regulations, the BLADE is at the very maximum power that is legally allowed to be sold to consumers, so for less efficient setups you might need something like the Dark Engine MAX (or similar) that can focus the beam tighter and get that allowed power into a smaller area. But that then negates the size advantage of the BLADE.
My apologies for the long winded nature of your return but, without going into boring minutia, the return was unfortunately protracted by the Post Office.
We didn't even know it was on the way back to us until we received an e-mail from you with the tracking number on 21 August, even though it was posted on the 9th.
After checking the tracking and seeing all the failed delivery attempts (no cards were left with us) we finally managed to get it delivered to a local Post Office (as whoever was doing the delivery route at the time seemed unable to deliver post.
We finally made a special trip to said Post Office and collected it on 30th August. The refund was done on 1 September. We can only refund for goods that we physically have back with us, but I understand the frustration.
In hindsight we should have sent you more updates on the non-delivery of the return, but in the end I had to find time to make a special trip to collect it myself, after it not being allowed to be collected due to non-matching ID previously. Again my apologies.
I'm glad you do have something that is compatible with your setup though.
Cheers
Clive