Illuminated reticles are allowed.What about illuminatEd reticle
They don't turn a glass scope into an NV scope and they do not intensify the light coming into the scope
Cheers
Bruce
Illuminated reticles are allowed.What about illuminatEd reticle
Thank you sir for your usual fulsome reply. I think the legislation will always be playing catch-up and inevitably NV will be very low, if at all even present, on any legislative programme there or elsewhere.No, because they do not intensify the light, they merely gather it in via the objective lens and pass it through the lens system for the user to see a magnified image.
The order dates from 1985 when the only NV technology available was what we now commonly call tubed NV, but is actually a light intensifying system where photons of light enter one end of the tube and cause a few electrons to be ejected from the first electrode, be accelerated towards another electrode where they eject more electrons. This process continues at each electrode until at the far end of the tube there can be more than 100,000 electrons resulting from a single photon entering the tube. When these electrons hit a phosphor screen at the far end of the tube they cause a dot of visible light to be produced
So, a single photon of visible light (which would not be detectable by the human eye) has been intensified to a level where it is visible to the human eye.
It has been argued (and I think correctly) that digital NV is not covered by the phrase "light intensifying" because digital NV does not work by intensifying existing light. However it is covered by the phrase "special device for night shooting" because digital NV is a device which is capable of night shooting - even although it can also be used in daylight
Hopefully these archaic rules will soon end and NV and thermal will be allowed when shooting deer in Scotland
Of course poachers have been using them in Scotland for years, but (and I stand to be corrected) I am unaware of anyone being prosecuted for using NV or thermal to shoot deer in Scotland
Cheers
Bruce
For Scotland, the secretary of state has powers to state what equipment is lawful / not lawful. In the Deer (Firearms etc) order of 1985
Section 5 says
It shall be lawful to use a sight which is NOT a light-intensifying, heat sensitive or other special sensitive device for night shooting.
This is reinforced in the Best Practice Guides
![]()
Home | Wild Deer Best Practice Guidance
bestpracticeguides.org.uk
And
![]()
Home | Wild Deer Best Practice Guidance
bestpracticeguides.org.uk
Both of which state use of night sights, image intensifying and thermal are prohibited.
And anybody who is on the fit and competent register has confirmed that fully understood and will abide by the best practice guides etc. and only those on the fit and competent register would be authorised to carry night shooting activities by Nature Scot (formerly called SNH).
What about using a night vision scope through the day whats wrong with that ,theyre used in england .Not thermal ,night visionYou can be rest assured if wee Nicola gives the thumbs up to joe the recreational stalker to use thermal for deer it will be licensed and probably cost you money to use it .
It's in the process, and driven by Government, not shooting orgs.Another thing the shooting org’s should jump on and try to have updated for Scotland!
This the one?The Scottish government have produced an interim report on using NV / Thermal scopes and to my mind it’s pretty limited. Can’t find it on my phone just now but I think they should be looking at how effective it have been for the past 10 years for foxing etc rather than a very limited report on deer.
Turn us loose with night scopes and more deer will be killed.
Personally I would probably favour NV over thermal when there is cover but either will work well.
I always enjoy the outpouring of obtuse arguments with this stuff, mainly from people with little to no experience but lots of opinion.
Shooting at night will get you more deer in 99% of cases and night scopes will increase that again so it’s only a matter of time.
That’s the one, cheers.
You asked this same question in your post#52 and I gave you the answer in post #53What about using a night vision scope through the day whats wrong with that ,theyre used in england .Not thermal ,night vision
Morally questionable?It might not be illegal, but in the wrong hands it can devastate a population and is morally questionable, i except that there is sometimes good reason and used by good people during daylight, but in the wrong hands it seems that it is too tempting to take deer out of hours and in cover that would not be visible by natural means, which would lead one to conclude that the safety of said shooting was questionable.
Are you saying it isn’t morally questionable to devastate a population just because you can?Morally questionable?
Maybe you didn't notice. It was a question.Are you saying it isn’t morally questionable to devastate a population just because you can?
I’m sorry you lost me on this.Maybe you didn't notice. It was a question.
Two years later…No I haven't had a reply, he has been online and would have seen the notification alert.
I can only presume he knows that he is talking rubbish.