One way to put your FAC/SGC at risk

[Mickeydredd]

There was CCTV evidence that the judge viewed that made him conclude that the guy's body language didn't suggest violence.
K.

I know, so having reviewed the cctv evidence and reaching that conclusion, what made him conclude that he verbally threatened him using the terminology claimed?

Of all the FAC holders on this site, I wonder how many would ever threaten to shoot someone?

 

[Pedro]

I know, so having reviewed the cctv evidence and reaching that conclusion, what made him conclude that he verbally threatened him using the terminology claimed?

Of all the FAC holders on this site, I wonder how many would ever threaten to shoot someone?

Very very few I'd think. I'm pretty reticent about telling some people that I might be involved in shooting anything, be it live or inanimate paper targets.

I agree that this is a situation that just escalated needlessly. The employee was, it seems drunk and was behaving like a behind. The employer, perhaps in retrospect might have been better off leaving the employee alone to accumulate enough rope to hang himself rather than intervening. Or perhaps leaving the job to security staff. Trying to get drunks to moderate their behaviour or do something such as leave somewhere is usually a futile task, even by police officers and more often than not results in a room for the night and some sort of liability such as a caution or perhaps a court appearance and fine.

Who knew that tailors' shops moved in the world of influencers and minor celebrities? Suits you sir!

 

[addjunkie]

There has been many a good career ruined by too much at a works function. This didn't sound like a good career to start with, however threatening to shoot someone is unacceptable behaviour, even in this woke world we now live.

People managment is the most difficult function of work I performed, fortunately drink was never involved or I may have ended up being honest and then unemployed!

 

[JTO]

The fact that I have gun license to lose has saved a lot of people from having their 'lights put out'. I can always count to TEN.

 

[JTO]

The wife of a colleague who worked in HR, once said to me about 'problem' staff:-

"If you do not write it down, you can rest assured that they are".

All well and good, when you have a 'day job' to be getting on with.

The issue being that "problem' staff, often have both the time and the inclination to 'record' everything - the bastards.

A few decades ago, a couple of brothers got caught with stuff with 'broad arrows' on it from the Portland dockyard, where they worked.
Their father, a union rep, had told them to write down everything they saw and heard 'going on'.
When they got hauled in, out came a notebook that it all written down in.
A lot of people got in a lot of hot water over it, one chap lost a really top job for half a tin of varnish and a paintbrush.
The pet rabbits of one of the brothers' children were later found nailed to the shed door!

 

[kenbro]

Very very few I'd think. I'm pretty reticent about telling some people that I might be involved in shooting anything, be it live or inanimate paper targets.

I agree that this is a situation that just escalated needlessly. The employee was, it seems drunk and was behaving like a behind. The employer, perhaps in retrospect might have been better off leaving the employee alone to accumulate enough rope to hang himself rather than intervening. Or perhaps leaving the job to security staff. Trying to get drunks to moderate their behaviour or do something such as leave somewhere is usually a futile task, even by police officers and more often than not results in a room for the night and some sort of liability such as a caution or perhaps a court appearance and fine.

Who knew that tailors' shops moved in the world of influencers and minor celebrities? Suits you sir!

Would suit Megan Markle too.
Ken.

 

[Franchi Matt]

Its fine to say things like that in your head though right?